4.4.4.4. Overall Contribution
The potential contributions of agroforestry systems to carbon sequestration
are summarized in Table 4-1 under the headings
of improved management within a land use and land-use change. The latter is
an order of magnitude higher than the former, given the lower initial levels
of carbon stocks. Overall, agroforestry can sequester carbon at time-averaged
rates of 0.2-3.1 t C ha-1. In temperate areas, the potential carbon storage
with agroforestry ranges from 15 to 198 t C ha-1 (Dixon et al., 1994),
with a modal value of 34 t C ha-1 (Dixon et al., 1993). The associated
impacts of agroforestry include helping to attain food security and secure land
tenure in developing countries, increasing farm income, restoring and maintaining
aboveground and below-ground biodiversity (including corridors between protected
forests), serving as CH4 sinks, maintaining watershed hydrology, and decreasing
soil erosion.
4.4.5. Forest Management
Forest management is the application of biological, physical, quantitative,
managerial, social, and policy principles to the regeneration, tending, utilization,
and conservation of forests to meet specified goals and objectives while maintaining
forest productivity. Management intensity spans the range from wilderness set-asides
to short-rotation woody cropping systems. Forest management encompasses the
full cycle of regeneration, tending, protection, harvest, utilization, and access.
A vast number and variety of activities exist and are being developed by researchers
to manage forests. The actual outcome of forest management (e.g., whether it
sequesters carbon, produces industrial wood or wood fuel, or protects biodiversity)
usually can be measured only as the integrated outcome of the suite of practices
used, not as the outcome of individual practices evaluated alone. The positive
impact of any practice may be realized only if applied in concert with one or
more other practices-each of which may have a minimal, or even negative, impact.
Thus, for forest management, measuring carbon stocks with a broad definition
of the activity (Section 4.3.2) and land-based accounting
methods (Section 4.3.3) may lead toward full accounting,
particularly if wood products are included in the accounting (Section
2.4.2.2).
The end use of wood products is important for two reasons. First, wood products
provide a stored carbon stock that depends on the life span of the product.
Wood-in-use stocks are growing larger in many countries, and management choices
(efforts to extend useful life, recycling, etc.) can contribute to further growth
in these stocks. Second, greater utilization of wood allows reduced use of fossil
fuel-by utilizing the wood either directly for energy production or to replace
energy-intensive products such as steel, aluminum, plaster board, and bricks.
Forest management in this chapter refers to forestry activities that are not
ARD activities as defined in Article 3.3 of the Kyoto Protocol. Although there
are many possible forest management activities, the following are examples that
are likely to alter carbon stocks:
- Forest regeneration
- Forest fertilization
- Pest management
- Forest fire management
- Harvest quantity and timing
- Low-impact harvesting
- Reducing forest degradation.
Brief descriptions of these activities follow (the Fact Sheets provide more
detail). The carbon sequestration potential of forestry activities varies considerably
between ecosystems, countries, and regions, and few empirical studies exist.
Table 4-9 lists some examples of existing studies to
illustrate the potential. Finally, it is assumed that forest management practices
that are implemented for carbon sequestration purposes will comply with existing
multilateral agreements (e.g., the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity
and Ramsar Convention of Wetlands) and the results of the ongoing United Nations
Intergovernmental Forum on Forests regarding sustainable forest management.
Table 4-9: Rates of potential carbon gain under
selected practices for forestland in various regions of the world.
|
|
Practice |
Country/Region
|
Rate of Carbon Gain
(t C ha-1 yr-1)
|
Time1
(yr)
|
Other GHGs and Impacts |
Notes2
|
|
Improved Natural Regeneration |
India
|
0.55
|
30
|
|
a
|
|
Increased Rotation Length |
Canada
|
0.022
|
80
|
Leakage (increased harvest elsewhere) |
b
|
USA
|
0.036
|
80
|
b
|
The Netherlands
|
0.035
|
80
|
b
|
|
Forest Fertilization |
Canada
|
0.03-0.19
|
20
|
+N2O, +NOX Ecological changes |
b
|
USA
|
0.08-0.48
|
20
|
b
|
The Netherlands
|
0.1-0.6
|
20
|
b
|
Norway
|
0.44
|
20
|
c
|
|
Forest Conservation |
India
|
0.48
|
30
|
Environmental improvements |
a
|
|
Reduced Forest Degradation |
Tropical/Global
|
1.7-4.6
|
40
|
Environmental improvements |
h
|
|
Several Practices Combined |
USA
|
3.1
|
50
|
Ecological changes |
d
|
Norway
|
0.12-0.20
|
20
|
e
|
|
Several Practices Combined, Lobloly Pine |
USA
|
1.2
|
40
|
Ecological changes |
f
|
USA
|
3.5
|
25
|
g
|
|
Species Change (Aspen to Red Pine) |
USA
|
0.88
|
80
|
Ecological changes |
f
|
|
1 Time interval to which estimated rate applies. This interval may or may
not be time required for ecosystem to reach new equilibrium.
2 a. Ravindranath et al. (1999).
b. Nabuurs et al. (1999).
c. Lunnan et al. (1991).
d. Birdsey et al. (2000).
e. Hoen and Solberg (1994); assuming harvest volume is kept constant.
f. Row (1996).
g. Albaugh et al. (1998); refers to intensive fertilization and irrigation
on an infertile drained sandy soil in North Carolina. Rate is an average estimate
of 3 years of measurements starting in 8-year-old stands.
h. Based on mean biomass stock differences between non-degraded and degraded
tropical forests as reported in FAO (1996). Stock differences are 182, 126,
and 70 tons dry matter per hectare for tropical wet, moist, and dry zones, respectively,
with carbon content as 50% of dry matter.
|
|
|