Krknose and Sumava National Parks, Czech Republic
Objectives and Activities
Temperate forest rehabilitation and reforestation.
Land Area and Type
14,000 ha broadleaf and conifer species forest.
Description of Activities
Designed to restore mountain forest degradation or mortality from air
pollution and acid deposition in unique Norway spruce (Picea abies)
stands, perhaps from coal-fired power plants in Poland. Studies indicate
natural regeneration of stands would be difficult, and grasslands would
dominate. About 7,000 ha were completely reforested, and mortality tree
gaps were planted on another 7,000 ha. Project implementation will be
17 years and its lifetime 99 years.
GHG Estimated Benefits and Methods
Cumulative net sequestration of 2,682,030 t C, using CO2FIX model. Average
carbon benefit is 192 t C ha-1, at 6.4 t C ha-1 yr-1.
Projected Socioeconomic Benefits
Increase in recreational and tourism value; 200 laborers/farmers involved.
Projected Environmental Impacts
May reduce air pollution levels, conserve and increase forest biodiversity,
and improve hydrologic system of the area.
Status of Project
Started in 1992; 5,400 ha planted to date.
Cost Estimate and Efficiency
$38.2 million total cost, public and private financing. Efficiency calculated
to be $14.25 per t C.
References
FACE Foundation (1998), Witthoeft-Muehlmann (1998).
Saskatchewan Soil Enhancement Project, Canada
Objectives and Activities
Assess carbon sequestration benefits of farmers changing from conventional
soil tillage to reduced-tillage systems.
Land Area and Type
150 experimental sites in Saskatchewan prairie grassland agricultural
cropping systems.
Partners
Regional soil conservation agencies, GEMCO (private consortium of Canadian
companies initiating GHG reduction pilot projects), and farmers.
Description of Activities
Establishment of experimental research sites to develop baseline soils
data and precise measurement locations for a network of fields representing
dominant soil types and land uses across Saskatchewan, to measure future
changes in soil carbon. Data will be used to calibrate soil carbon simulation
models, such as CENTURY, to predict changes in soil carbon across the
province, for potential generation of carbon credits for emissions trading
in Canada or internationally.
GHG Estimated Benefits and Methods
CENTURY model.
Projected Socioeconomic Benefits
Generation of new carbon commodity for farmers; reduced farm energy
costs of alternative tillage systems.
Projected Environmental Impacts
Enhanced soil tilth and carbon sequestration, reduced erosion of soil
and carbon off-field, improved local air and water quality.
Status of Project
Several years of data collection from established sites; technical papers
and modeling.
Cost Estimate and Efficiency
Not applicable.
References
Padbury (1999).
Rehabilitation of Mt. Elgon and Kibale National Parks,
Uganda
Objectives and Activities
Tropical forest rehabilitation and reforestation.
Land Area and Type
27,000 ha broadleaf and conifer species forest.
Partners
FACE Foundation, Netherlands, and Uganda national parks agency.
Description of Activities
Restoration of natural forest and reforestation using native tree species,
and fire control, within two national parks. Cooperation with the IUCN-sponsored
project in adjacent communities to support sustainable land use in buffer
zones around the parks, to reduce forest degradation and forest conversion
to agriculture from fire and logging within them. Activities to be implemented
over 17 years; project lifetime is 99 years.
GHG Estimated Benefits and Methods
707,000 t C total over lifetime, using CO2FIX model. Average carbon
benefit is 26 t C ha-1, at 0.9 t C ha-1 yr.
Projected Socioeconomic Benefits
Reforestation planting jobs.
Projected Environmental Impacts
Reduced soil erosion, improved water quality, reduced logging and fire
degradation of park, conserving biodiversity.
Status of Project
Began in 1994; rehabilitation or replanting has occurred on 5,700 ha
to date.
Cost Estimate and Efficiency
$2.6 million total cost, with private financing. Efficiency calculated
to be $27.80 per t C.
References
FACE Foundation (1998), Witthoeft-Muehlmann (1998).
Rio Bravo Conservation and Management Area (RBCMA)
Carbon Sequestration Pilot Project, Belize
Objectives and Activities
Tropical forest sustainable forest management and protection.
Land Area and Type
14,327 ha of tropical forest acquired and protected; 46,406 ha put under
sustainable forest management.
Partners
Programme for Belize (private conservation and development organization)
and The Nature Conservancy. Financed by U.S. electric utilities (Wisconsin
Power Company, CINergy, Detroit Edison, PacifiCorp, EEI Utilitree Carbon
Company) and Suncor Energy, Inc.
Description of Activities
Component A involves the purchase of endangered forest land, thereby
expanding RBCMA's existing protected forest areas. If not protected,
this property is highly likely to be converted to agricultural use,
permanently dividing the RBCMA ecosystem. Component B involves the development
of a sustainable forestry management program that will increase the
level and rate of carbon sequestered within half of the RBCMA, including
the purchased parcel. The remaining RBCMA lands will be left undisturbed
for experimental control areas, conservation, and research.
GHG Estimated Benefits and Methods
2.4 million t C total over 40-yr lifetime, using Winrock GHG estimation
and monitoring software. Average carbon benefit is 31 t C ha-1, at 0.8
t C ha-1 yr-1.
Projected Socioeconomic Benefits
Create jobs in newly established forest products industry; enhance commercial
value of forests; transfer forest monitoring and management technologies;
protect Mayan archaeological sites.
Projected Environmental Impacts
Conserve biodiversity from agricultural conversion; enhance water quality
via reduced soil erosion.
Status of Project
In year 5 of a 40-yr project.
Cost Estimate and Efficiency
$2.6 million total cost, with private financing. Efficiency calculated
to be $3 per t C.
References
EPA/USIJI (1998), Witthoeft-Muehlmann (1998), TNC (1999).
Scolel Te Pilot Project for Community Forestry and
Carbon Sequestration, Chiapas, Mexico
Objectives and Activities
Tropical forest and highland conifer forest reforestation and community
agroforestry on individual farmers' small plots.
Land Area and Type
2,000 ha within 13,200 ha (project size depends on funding received).
Partners
Wide range, including local credit unions, regional research institute
(ECOSUR), University of Edinburgh, UK-Overseas Development Administration,
International Automobile Federation, among others.
Description of Activities
Consultations with local village farmers identified preferred candidate
reforestation, forest management, and agroforestry practices. The project
designed a system of technical assistance to farmers by producing plans
for each parcel, calculating carbon benefits, and developing a monitoring
protocol. International Automobile Federation funded the first implemented
management plans. Project is designed to reduce degradation and conversion
of remnant forest, and to enhance village land-use sustainability and
financial returns.
GHG Estimated Benefits and Methods
Cumulative net sequestration of 15,000-333,000 t C total over lifetime,
using CO2FIX model. Average carbon benefit is 26 t C ha-1, at 0.9 t
C ha-1 yr-1.
Projected Socioeconomic Benefits
Build local economy through sustainable agroforestry; improve welfare
of women and villagers.
Projected Environmental Impacts
Conserve and increase forest biodiversity, reduce forest fragmentation
and soil erosion, serve as buffer zone by slowing in-migration to the
forest.
Status of Project
50 ha funded for initial implementation. Detailed studies at community
and regional scale completed. Management, research, and financial institutions
established.
Cost Estimate and Efficiency
$3.4 million projected total cost, with initial phase at $0.5 million,
and public and private financing. Efficiency calculated to be $10 per
t C.
References
EPA/USIJI (1998), Tipper and de Jong (1998), Witthoeft-Muehlmann (1998).
INFAPRO: Innoprise-FACE Foundation Project, Sabah,
Malaysia
Objectives and Activities
Enrichment planting and forest rehabilitation in previously harvested
mature forest.
Land Area and Type
25,000 ha of selectively logged dipterocarp lowland tropical forest
concession lands.
Partners
Innoprise Corporation (forestry arm of Sabah Foundation, Sabah, Malaysia)
and FACE (Forests Absorbing CO2 Emissions) Foundation of Dutch Electricity
Board, The Netherlands.
Description of Activities
The project estimates it will sequester approximately 4.3 million t
C over the course of 60 years, largely using literature data for the
estimate. Permanent sample plots to measure stem growth are established;
necromass, understory, and soil data collected for the ICSB-NEP RIL
project are being used (see Table 5-2).
GHG Estimated Benefits and Methods
707,000 t C total over lifetime, using CO2FIX model. Average carbon
benefit is 26 t C ha-1, at 0.9 t C ha-1 yr-1.
Projected Socioeconomic Benefits
Generate US$ 800 million in timber, which will revert to the social
programs of the Sabah Foundation. Build capacity through technical training,
at all levels of project staff, and with local, regional, and international
organizations. Direct employment of more than 150 people.
Projected Environmental Impacts
Improve at least 25,000 ha of degraded logged forests.
Status of Project
The project is in the seventh year of its implementation phase, which
is planned to last 25 years; project lifetime is 99 years. If CDM guidelines
and crediting are not in place soon, implementation of this project
may be halted.
Cost Estimate and Efficiency
$15 million total cost, with private financing. Efficiency calculated
to be $3.50 per t C.
References
FACE Foundation (1998), Stuart and Moura-Costa (1998), Witthoeft-Muehlmann
(1998).
NOTE: For all case studies described, GHG and cost estimates are provisional.
These estimates are genearally provided by project developers and do
not use consistent, comparable methods.
|