8.2.1 Vehicle Technology Improvements
Vehicle technology improvements normally involve proper maintenance, improving
the engine or vehicle body, or reducing inertia with the main aim of reducing
the energy intensity (energy use per useful product) and so reducing carbon
emissions. Regular servicing, including regular tire and oil checks, and engine
tuning can lead to fuel savings of 2-10% (Davidson, 1992; Pischinger and Hausberger,
1993). Use of three-way catalytic converters along with electronic fuel injecting
systems can result in reduction of ozone precursors (unburned HC, CO, NOx)
emitted from gasoline cars and heavy-duty vehicles, but the effect on global
warming is uncertain because the impact of fuel consumption is also uncertain
(IPCC, 1996). Improved combustion by use of gas turbines and low-heat-rejection
engines can potentially result in higher efficiency and, thus, in lower emissions,
but there will be a need for high temperature materials along with compatible
high temperature lubricating systems. Also, direct-ignition stratified-charge
engines can be more efficient because of their ignition enhancing qualities.
Details of these potential reductions are given in Table
8.2. The potential exists for increasing vehicle mileage and, therefore,
energy intensity by reducing the aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance leading
to improved efficiency and, thereby, reducing the emissions (ETSU, 1994; DeCicco
and Ross, 1993). Similarly, through size reduction, material substitution or
component redesign, the inertia can be reduced and so lower the fuel consumption
(DeCicco and Ross, 1993). Improving the transmission system to electronically
allow for optimal speed and load conditions can result in energy savings and
reduced emissions (Tanja et al., 1992; NRC, 1992). More details of these
potential reductions are summarised in Table 8.3.
Table 8.2 Technical and potential
combustion control technologies (Source: IEA/OECD, 1998) |
TECHNOLOGY |
EXAMPLES |
STATUS |
TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY |
CONVERSION EFFICIENCY |
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT |
MARKET
POTENTIAL
TIME FRAME |
ICE CONTROL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Improved Exhaust Treatment |
Catalyst traps, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)
Intake and exhaust systems
Advanced emissions abatement in heavy-duty vehicles
|
Deployed in autos· Limited diesel application |
Continuing after treatment improvement
Allows continued use of ICE
|
Slight decrease for significant Ox reduction
Increased back pressure reduces efficiency in diesels
|
Up to 97% control for HC and CO
Up to 85% control for Ox
Up to 85% control for particulate
|
0-5 years |
2. Improved Combustion |
Ceramic components
Ignition systems
Flow dynamics variable valves
Turbine engine
|
Incremental improvements |
Good variety of technology
Available technology must integrate with current ICE
|
5-10% engine efficiency gains |
Ox particulate and CO2
reduction |
0-10 years |
3. Fast Warm-up |
Thin wall engines
Start/stop with flywheel storage
|
Incremental improvements |
Transient time decreased by 50% |
Average efficiency gains of <5% |
<10% average reduction
<30% reduction in first 60-120 seconds
|
0-10 years |
Table 8.3 Technical and potential
vehicle improvements options (Source: IEA/OECD, 1998) |
TECHNOLOGY |
EXAMPLES |
STATUS |
TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY |
CONVERSION EFFICIENCY |
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT |
MARKET POTENTIAL TIME FRAME |
VEHICLE IMPROVEMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Drag and rolling resistance reduction |
Drag coefficient reduction
Reduced rolling resistance
Reduced bearings friction |
Commercial potential for improvement in low-friction bearings and lubrications
Low-friction tyros to be tested |
Continuation of improvements dependent on material properties & cost
of manufacture Study on basic physics |
Speed sensitive benefits Gains of 1-5% possible |
Reduction of all emissions in proportion to efficiency gains |
0-10 years |
2. Structural weight |
Light structures Bonded/composite structures
Light powertrains |
Commercial/demonstrated Bonded structures in limited use
Composite materials in most vehicles |
Continuation of improvementsLimited by material properties and relative
cost of manufacture |
0.2 to 0.4% gain for every 1% weight reduction |
Reduction of all emissions in proportion to efficiency gains
Greater effect on acceleration emissions (urban traffic) as vehicle inertia
is diminished |
0-10 years |
3. Transmission |
Electronic shift Multistep lock-up Continuously variable transmission
(CVT) electric drives Drivelines and suspensions |
Commercial/demonstrated technology CVT available High power CVT in prototype
Lock-up and electronic control |
CVT/IVT in widespread use in next decade
Hybrid powertrains feasible with CVT/IVT |
10-15% gain over manual with CVT or IVTelectronic drives could further
increase this conversion efficiency |
Reduction of all emissions in proportion to efficiency gains Engine operation
optimised, decreasing emissions even more than efficiency improvement |
0-10 years |
4. Accessories |
On-board electronic controls
Constant speed drives Efficient components |
Demand responsive systems gaining preference
Constant speed systems in demonstrations |
Highly feasible for constant speed
High efficiency accessory systems |
<5% efficiency gain |
Emissions reduction facilitated by on-board electronic controls and sensors |
0-10 years |
Trends show that if priorities shift among manufacturers and users, improvements
of 10-25% in energy intensity may be achievable on cars by 2020 at a higher
cost, but the potential for commercial vehicles will be smaller. However, fuel
savings and environmental gains may be offset by the increase in number of vehicles
and driving (Wootton and Poulton, 1993).
The trend in buses for higher level of comfort and safety, and more powerful
engines has tended to increase fuel consumption per seat compared with old buses,
but this can be reduced by using advanced composite materials and turbo-compound
diesel engines. Electric buses are in use as minibuses in urban areas, but they
have higher GHG emissions than diesel buses when the primary emissions than
diesel buses when the primary energy used is from fossil sources. Hybrid buses
(diesel/electric) are now being tested because they can save up to 30% in energy
if the motor/generator efficiency is about 85%. Alternative fuels (CNG, alcohol
fuels and vegetable oils) are used in buses and when rapeseed methyl ester is
used as substitute for diesel, life-cycle GHG emissions can be reduced by 25-50%
(IEA/OECD, 1994). Use of turbo-charging and charge cooling in engines of trucks
improves the fuel economy and so reduces GHG emissions, but retarding fuel injection
worsens the fuel economy. Potential exists for improvement in fuel economy based
on developments of new engine materials (IEA/OECD, 1993). Fuel economy can also
be improved in the design of trains. About 5-10% savings is possible in diesel
locomotives and up to 30% if a regenerative braking system is used in urban
metro systems; 15% savings could be realised in suburban train systems and 5-10%
for inter-city systems.
Energy intensity in aircraft can be improved with engine modifications and
new engine designs. Future improved supersonic engines that are expected after
2010 may lead to an increase in energy efficiency and lower emissions, but this
improvement could lead to increase traffic movements (Balashov and Smith, 1992).
Energy intensity for boats can be improved by modifying marine engines by making
improvements in the hull and propeller designs that could yield to higher energy
gains. The use of vertical-axis turbines as sails can assist the engine and
result in energy savings (CEC, 1992).
|