|  
9.7. Infectious Diseases 
 The ecology and transmission dynamics of infectious diseases are complex and, 
  in at least some respects, unique for each disease within each locality. Some 
  infectious diseases spread directly from person to person; others depend on 
  transmission via an intermediate "vector" organism (e.g., mosquito, 
  flea, tick), and some also may infect other species (especially mammals and 
  birds). 
The "zoonotic" infectious diseases cycle naturally in animal populations. 
  Transmission to humans occurs when humans encroach on the cycle or when there 
  is environmental disruption, including ecological and meteorological factors. 
  Various rodent-borne diseases, for example, are dependent on environmental conditions 
  and food availability that determine rodent population size and behavior. An 
  explosion in the mouse population following extreme rainfall from the 1991-1992 
  El Niño event is believed to have contributed to the first recorded outbreak 
  of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in the United States (Engelthaler et al., 1999; 
  Glass et al., 2000).  
 
Many important infectious diseases, especially in tropical countries, are transmitted 
  by vector organisms that do not regulate their internal temperatures and therefore 
  are sensitive to external temperature and humidity (see Table 
  9-1). Climate change may alter the distribution of vector speciesincreasing 
  or decreasing the ranges, depending on whether conditions are favorable or unfavorable 
  for their breeding places (e.g., vegetation, host, or water availability). Temperature 
  also can influence the reproduction and maturation rate of the infective agent 
  within the vector organism, as well as the survival rate of the vector organism, 
  thereby further influencing disease transmission.  
 
Changes in climate that will affect potential transmission of infectious diseases 
  include temperature, humidity, altered rainfall, and sea-level rise. It is an 
  essential but complex task to determine how these factors will affect the risk 
  of vector- and rodent-borne diseases. Factors that are responsible for determining 
  the incidence and geographical distribution of vector-borne diseases are complex 
  and involve many demographic and societalas well as climaticfactors 
  (Gubler, 1998b). An increase in vector abundance or distribution does not automatically 
  cause an increase in disease incidence, and an increase in incidence does not 
  result in an equal increase in mortality (Chan et al., 1999). Transmission requires 
  that the reservoir host, a competent arthropod vector, and the pathogen be present 
  in an area at the same time and in adequate numbers to maintain transmission. 
  Transmission of human diseases is dependent on many complex and interacting 
  factors, including human population density, housing type and location, availability 
  of screens and air conditioning on habitations, human behavior, availability 
  of reliable piped water, sewage and waste management systems, land use and irrigation 
  systems, availability and efficiency of vector control programs, and general 
  environmental hygiene. If all of these factors are favorable for transmission, 
  several meteorological factors may influence the intensity of transmission (e.g., 
  temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation patterns). All of the foregoing 
  factors influence the transmission dynamics of a disease and play a role in 
  determining whether endemic or epidemic transmission occurs. 
 
The resurgence of infectious diseases in the past few decades, including vector-borne 
  diseases, has resulted primarily from demographic and societal factorsfor 
  example, population growth, urbanization, changes in land use and agricultural 
  practices, deforestation, international travel, commerce, human and animal movement, 
  microbial adaptation and change, and breakdown in public health infrastructure 
  (Lederberg et al., 1992; Gubler, 1989, 1998a). To date, there is little evidence 
  that climate change has played a significant role in the recent resurgence of 
  infectious diseases. 
 
The following subsections describe diseases that have been identified as most 
  sensitive to changes in climate. The majority of these assessments rely on expert 
  judgment. Where models have been developed to assess the impact of climate change, 
  these also are discussed.  
   
    
   
    | Table 9-2: Effect of climate factors on vector- 
      and rodent-borne disease transmission. | 
   
   
       | 
   
   
    | Climate Factor | 
     
      Vector
     | 
     
      Pathogen
     | 
     
      Vertebrate Host 
        and Rodents
     | 
   
   
       | 
   
   
    Increased 
      temperature | 
     
      
        - Decreased survival, e.g., Culex. tarsalis
 
          (Reeves et al., 1994) 
        - Change in susceptibility to some pathogens
 
          (Grimstad and Haramis, 1984; Reisen, 1995); 
          seasonal effects (Hardy et al., 1990) 
        - Increased population growth (Reisen, 1995)
 
        - Increased feeding rate to combat dehydration,
 
          therefore increased vector-human contact 
        - Expanded distribution seasonally and spatially
 
       
     | 
     
      
        - Increased rate of extrinsic
 
          incubation in vector 
          (Kramer et al., 1983; Watts 
          et al., 1987) 
        - Extended transmission
 
          season (Reisen et al., 1993, 
          1995) 
        - Expanded distribution (Hess
 
          et al., 1963) 
       
     | 
     
      
        - Warmer winters favor
 
          rodent survival 
       
     | 
   
   
       | 
   
   
    Decreases in 
      precipitation | 
     
      
        - Increase in container-breeding mosquitoes
 
          because of increased water storage 
        - Increased abundance for vectors that breed in
 
          dried-up river beds (Wijesunder, 1988) 
        - Prolonged droughts could reduce or eliminate
 
          snail populations 
       
     | 
     
      
     | 
     
      
        - Decreased food
 
          availability can reduce 
          populations 
        - Rodents may be more
 
          likely to move into 
          housing areas, increasing 
          human contact 
       
     | 
   
   
       | 
   
   
    Increases in 
      precipitation | 
     
      
        - Increased rain increases quality and quantity
 
          of larval habitat and vector population size 
        - Excess rain can eliminate habitat by flooding
 
        - Increased humidity increases vector survival
 
        - Persistent flooding may increase potential
 
          snail habitats downstream 
       
     | 
     
      
        - Little evidence of direct
 
          effects 
        - Some data on humidity
 
          effect on malarial parasite 
          development in Anopheline 
          mosquito host 
       
     | 
     
      
        - Increased food
 
          availability and 
          population size (Mills 
          et al., 1999) 
       
     | 
   
   
       | 
   
   
    Increase in 
      precipitation 
      extremes | 
     
      
        - Heavy rainfall events can synchronize vector
 
          host-seeking and virus transmission (Day and 
          Curtis, 1989) 
        - Heavy rainfall can wash away breeding sites
 
       
     | 
     
      
     | 
     
      
        - Risk of contamination
 
          of flood waters/runoff 
          with pathogens from 
          rodents or their excrement 
          (e.g., Leptospira from 
          rat urine) 
       
     | 
   
   
       | 
   
   
    | Sea-level rise | 
     
      
        - Coastal flooding affects vector abundance for
 
          mosquitoes that breed in brackish water (e.g., 
          An. subpictus and An. sundaicus malaria 
          vectors in Asia) 
       
     | 
     
      
     | 
     
      
     | 
   
   
       | 
   
 
 
 |