References

Aaserud, M., 1996: Costs and Benefits of Climate Policies: An Integrated Economy-Energy-Environment Model Approach for Norway. In Modelling the Economy and the Environment. B. Madsen, C. Jensen-Butler, J.B. Mortensen, A.M. Bruun Christensen,(eds.), Springer, Berlin.
Aasness, J., T. Bye, and H. T. Mysen, 1996: Welfare effects of emission taxes in Norway. Energy Economics, 18(4), 335-46.
ABARE-DFAT, 1995: Global Climate Change. Economic Dimensions of a Global Policy Response Beyond 2000. ABARE, Canberra, Australia.
Abt Associates, 1997: International PM Mortality Impacts in 2020 from Greenhouse Gas Policies. Memorandum, Environmental Research Area, USA.
Abt Associates, and Pechan-Avanti Group, 1999: Co-Control Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Control Policies. Prepared for the Office of Policy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Contract No. 68-W4-0029.
Adegbulugbe, A.O., F.I. Ibitoye, W.O. Siyanbola, G.A. Oladosu, J.F.K. Akiubonu, et al., 1997: GHG Emission Mitigation in Nigeria. In Global Climate Change Mitigation Assessment: Results from 14 transitioning and developing countries, US Country Studies Program, Washington, DC.
Adi, A.C., C.L. Malik, and A. Nurrohim, 1997: Mitigation of CO₂ from Indonesia’s Energy System. Applied Energy, 56(3-4), 253-263.
Alfsen, K., H. Birkelund and M. Aaserud, 1995: Impacts of an EC Carbon/Energy Tax and Deregulating Thermal Power Supply on CO₂, SO₂ and NO_x Emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 165-189
ALGAS (Asian Least-Cost Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategy), 1999a: Summary Report. Asian Development Bank, Manila.
ALGAS, 1999b: Profiles of Investment and Technical Assistance. Greenhouse Gas Abatement Projects. Asian Development Bank, Manila.
ALGAS, 1999c: People’s Republic of China.
1999d. Republic of Korea.
1999e. Myanmar.
1999f. Pakistan.
1999g. Philippines.
1999h. Thailand. Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Almon, C., 1991: The INFORUM Approach to Interindustry Modelling. Economic Systems Research, 3, 1-7.
Andersen, F.M., H.K. Jacobsen, P.E Morthorst, A. Olsen, M. Rasmussen, T. Thomsen, and P. Trier, 1998: EMMA: En energi- og miljørelateret satellitmodel til ADAM (EMMA an energy and environmental satellite model related to ADAM). Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift, 136(3), 333-349.
Anderson, J., R. Morgenstern, and M. Toman, 1999: The Rationale for Flexibility in the Design of Greenhouse Gas Abatement Policies: A Review of Economic Issues. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Arrow, K., 1962: The Economic Implication of Learning by Doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173.
Aunan, K., H.A. Aaheim, and H.M. Seip, 2000: Reduced Damage to Health and Environment from Energy Saving in Hungary. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Babiker, M., M. E. Bautista, H. D. Jacoby, and J. M. Reilly, 2000: Effects of Differentiating Climate Policy by Sector: A U.S. Example. In Sectoral Economic Costs and Benefits of GHG Mitigation, Proceedings of the IPCC Expert Meeting, February 14-15, 2000, L. Bernstein, J. Pan, (eds.), Eisensach, Germany.
Bahn, O., E. Fragnière, and S. Kypreos, 1996: Swiss Energy Taxation Options to Curb CO₂ Emissions. Conference Proceedings, The 1996 European Environment Conference, West Yorkshire, UK, pp.1-6.
Bahn, O., A. Haurie, S. Kypreos, and J.-P. Vial, 1998: Advanced Mathematical Programming Modeling to Assess the Benefits from International CO₂ Abatement Cooperation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3, 107-115.
Bahn, O., A. Cadena, and S. Kypreos, 1999a: Joint Implementation of CO₂ Emission Reduction Measures between Switzerland and Colombia. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 11, 1-12.
Bahn, O., S. Kypreos, B. Bueler, and H. J. Luthi, 1999b: Modelling an International Market of CO₂ Emission Permits. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 12(1-6), 283-291.
Bailie, A., B. Sadownik, A. Taylor, M. Nanduri, R. Murphy, J. Nyboer, M. Jaccard, and A. Pape, 1998: Cost Curve Estimation for Reducing CO₂ Emissions in Canada: An Analysis by Province and Sector. Office of Energy Efficiency, Natural Resources, Canada.
Barker, T., 1993: Secondary Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Abatement: The Effects of a UK Carbon/Energy Tax on Air Pollution. Energy-Environment-Economy Modelling. Discussion Paper N°4, ESRC Research Project on Policy Options for Sustainable Energy Use in a General Model of the Economy.
Barker, T., 1997. Taxing pollution instead of jobs: Towards more employment without more inflation through fiscal reform in the UK. Ecotaxation, T. O’Riordan, (ed.), Earthscan Publ., London.
Barker, T., 1998a: Policy Evaluation in a Multi-sectoral Framework. European-US Conference on Post-Kyoto Strategies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Barker, T, 1998b: The Effects on Competitiveness of Coordinated versus Unilateral Fiscal Policies Reducing GHG Emissions in the EU: An Assessment of a 10% Reduction by 2010 Using the E3ME Model. Energy Policy, 26(14), 1083-1098.
Barker, T. 1998c: The Use of Energy-Environment-Economy Models to Inform Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policy, Special Section.In Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal: Reflections on the Use of Models in Policy Making, S. Shackley, (ed.), 16(2), June 1998, pp. 133-131.
Barker, T., 1999: Achieving a 10% cut in Europe’s CO₂ Emissions using Additional Excise Duties: Coordinated, Uncoordinated and Unilateral Action Using the Econometric Model E3ME. Economic Systems Research, 11 (4), 401-421.
Barker, T., and N. Johnstone, 1993: Equity and Efficiency in Policies to Reduce Carbon Emissions in the Domestic Sector . Energy & Environment, 4 (4), 335-361.
Barker, T., and J. Kohler, 1998: Equity and Ecotax Reform in the EU: Achieving a 10% Reduction in CO₂ Emissions Using Excise Duties. Fiscal Studies, 19 (4), 375-402.
Barker, T., and K.E. Rosendahl, 2000: Ancillary Benefits of GHG Mitigation in Europe: SO₂, NO_x and PM10 reductions from policies to meet Kyoto targets using the E3ME model and Externe valuations. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Berg, E., S. Kverndokk, and K. Rosendahl, 1997a: Gains from Cartelisation in the Oil Market. Energy Policy, 25(13), 1075-1091.
Berg, E., S. Kverndokk,, and K. E. Rosendahl, 1997b: Market Power, International CO₂ Taxation and Petroleum Wealth. The Energy Journal, 18(4), 33-71.
Bergman, L.,1995: Sectoral Differentiation as a Substitute for International Coordination of Carbon Taxes: A Case Study of Sweden. In Environmental Policy with Political and Economic Integration. J. Braden , T. Ulen, (eds.), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Bernard, A.L., and M. Vielle. 1999a: Efficient Allocation of a Global Environment Cost between Countries : Tradable Permits VERSUS Taxes or Tradable Permits AND Taxes ? An appraisal with a World General Equilibrium Model. Working Paper, Ministère de l’équipement des transports et du logement, France.
Bernard, A.L., and M. Vielle. 1999b: The Pure Economics of Tradable Pollution Permits. Working paper, Ministère de l’équipement des transports et du logement, France.
Bernard, A.L., and M. Vielle. 1999c. Rapport à la Mission Interministérielle sur l’Effet de Serre relatif aux évaluation du Protocole de Kyoto effectuées avec le modèle GEMINI-E3 (Report to the MIES on the greenhouse effect: An evaluation of the Kyoto Protocol with the GEMINI-E3 Model, Ministère de l’équipement des transports et du logement, Commissariat à l’énergie atomique, France.
Bernstein, P., D. Montgomery, and T. Rutherford, 1999: Global Impacts of the Kyoto Agreement: Results from the MS-MRT model. Resource and Energy Economics, 21(3-4), 375-413.
Böhringer, C. , 1997: NEWAGE - Modellinstrumentarium zur gesamtwirtschaftlichen Analyse von Energie- und Umweltpolitiken, In Energiemodelle in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland - Stand der Entwicklung, S. Molt, U. Fahl, (ed.), Jülich, Germany, pp. 99-121.
Böhringer, C. , 2000: Cooling Down Hot Air - A Global CGE Analysis of Post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies, Energy Polic, 28, 779-789.
Böhringer, C., and T.F. Rutherford, 1997: Carbon Taxes with Exemptions in an Open Economy - A General Equilibrium Analysis of the German Tax Initiative. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 189-203.
Böhringer, C., T.F. Rutherford, 1999: Decomposing General Equilibrium Effects of Policy Intervention in Multi-Regional Trade Models - Methods and Sample Application. ZEW Discussion Paper 99-36, Mannheim, Germany.
Böhringer, C., T.F. Rutherford, 2001: World Economic Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol. In Internalization of the Economy, Environmental Problems and New Policy Options, P.J.J. Welfens, R. Hillebrand, A. Ulph, (eds.), Springer, Heidelberg/New York.
Böhringer, C., et al., 1997: Volkswirtschaftliche Effekte einer Umstrukturierung des deutschen Steuersystems unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Umweltsteuern. Forschungsbericht des Instituts für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung, Universität Stuttgart, Band 37, Stuttgart.
Borja-Aburto, V.H., D.P. Loomis, S.I. Bangdiwala, C.M. Shy, and R.A. Rascon-Pacheco, 1997: Ozone, Suspended Particulates and Daily Mortality in Mexico City. American Journal of Epidemiology 145(3), 258-68.
Borja-Aburto, V.H., M. Castillejos, D. R. Gold, S. Bierzwinski, and D. Loomis, 1998: Mortality and Ambient fine Particles in Southwest Mexico City, 1993-1995. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106, 849-855.
Bovenberg, A. L., and L.H. Goulder, 2001: Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO₂ Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost? In Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policies, C. Carraro , G. Metcalf, ( eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.
Boyd, R., K. Krutilla and W.K. Viscusi, 1995: Energy Taxation as a Policy Instrument to Reduce CO₂ Emissions: A Net Benefit Analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(1), 1-25.
Braga, A., G. Conceicao, L. Pereira, H. Kishi, J. Pereira, and M. Andrade, 1999: Air Pollution and Pediatric Hospital Admissions in Sao Paulo. Journal of Environmental Medicine 1, 95-102.
Brännlund, R., and I.-M. Gren, 1999: Green Taxes in Sweden: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis of the Carbon Tax and the Tax on Nitrogen in Fertilizers. In Green Taxes – Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence from Scandinavia. R. Brännlund, I-M. Gren, (eds.), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Bråten, J., and R. Golombek, 1998: OPEC’s Response to International Climate Agreements. Environmental and Resource Economics, 12(4), 425-42.
Brendemoen, A., and H. Vennemo, 1994: A Climate Treaty and the Norwegian Economy: A CGE Assessment. The Energy Journal, 15(1), 77-93.
Brown et al., 1997a: Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions: Potential Impacts of Energy Technologies by 2010 and Beyond. Prepared by ORNL, LBNL, PNNL, NREL, ANL for the U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Brown, S., D. Donovan, B. Fisher, K. Hanslow, M. Hinchy, M. Matthewson, C. Polidano, V. Tulpulé, and S. Wear, 1997b: The Economic Impact of International Climate Change Policy. ABARE Research Report 97.4, Canberra, Australia.
Brown, M., M. Levine, J. Romm, A. Rosenfeld, and J. Koomey, 1998: Engineering-Economics Studies of Energy Technologies to reduce GHG emissions: Opportunities and Challenges. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 23, 287-385.
Brown, S., D. Kennedy, C. Polidano, K. Woffenden, G. Jakeman, B. Graham, F. Jotzo, and B. Fisher, 1999: Economic Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol: Accounting for the Three Major Greenhouse Gases. ABARE Research Report 99.6, Canberra, Australia.
Brown et al. 2000: A Clean Energy Future for the US, prepared by ORNL, LBNL, PNNL, NREL, ANL for the U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Burtraw, D., and M. Toman, 1997: The Benefits of Reduced Air Pollutants in the U.S. from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies. Discussion Paper 98-01-REV, Resources for the Future, USA.
Burtraw, D., A. Krupnick, K. Palmer, A. Paul, M. Toman, and C. Bloyd, 1999: Ancillary Benefits of Reduced Air Pollution in the US from Moderate Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies in the Electricity Sector. Discussion Paper 99-51, Resources for the Future, USA.
Bye, B., 2000: Environmental Tax Reform and Producer Foresight: An Intertemporal Computable General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22,(6), 719-752.
Bye, B., and K. Nyborg, 1999: The Welfare Effects of Carbon Policies: Grandfathered Quotas versus Differentiated Taxes. Discussion Papers 261, Statistics Norway, Norway.
Capros, P., L. Mantzos, L. Vouyoukas, and D. Petrellis, 1999a: European Energy and CO₂ Emissions Trends to 2020. Paper presented at IEA/EMF/IIASA Energy Modelling Meeting, Paris, June 1999, 1-18.
Capros, P., L. Mantzos, P. Criqui, Kouvaritakis, Sorai, Scrattenkolzer, and L. Vouyoukas, 1999b: Climate Technology Strategy 1: Controling Grenhouse Gases. Policy and Technology Options. Springer Verlag eds., Berlin.
Capros, P., T. Georgakopoulos, D. Van Regemorter, S. Proost, T.F.N Schmidt, K. Conrad, and L. Vouyoukas, 1999c: Climate Technology Strategy: Controlling Greenhouse Gases 2: The Macroeconomic Costs and Benefits of Reducing Greenhouse Gases Emissions in the European Union. Springer Verlag eds., Berlin.
Carraro, C., and M. Galeotti, 1995: Voluntary agreements: A macro-economic assessment. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Bergamo, Italy, June.
Carraro, C., and A. Soubeyran, 1996: Environmental Taxation and Employment in a Multi-sector General Equilibrium Model. In Environmental Fiscal Reform and Unemployment. Kluwer Academnic Publishers, London.
Chung, W., Y. June Wu, and J. D. Fuller, 1997: Dynamic Energy Environment Equilibrium Model for the Assessment of CO₂ Emission in Canada and the USA. Energy Economics, 19, 103-124.
Cifuentes, L., J.J. Prieto, et al., 1999: Valuation of mortalitiy risk reductions at present and at an advanced age: Preliminary results from a contingent valuation study. Annual Meeting of the Latin American and Caribean Economic Association, Santiago, Chile.
Cifuentes, L., E. Sauma, H. Jorquera, and F. Soto, 2000: Co-controls Benefits Analysis for Chile: Preliminary estimation of the potential co-control benefits for Chile. COP-5: Progress Report (Revised Version), L.A. Cifuentes, E. Sauma, H.Jorquera, F. Soto, (eds.), 12 Nov 1999.
Conniffe, D., J. Fitz Gerald, S. Scott, and F. Shortall, 1997: The Costs to Ireland of GHG Abatement. ESRI (Economic and Social Research Institute), Dublin. See also: B.O.Cleirgh, 1998: Environmental Resources Management, Economic Research Institute; Limitation and Reduction of CO₂ and other Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Ireland. Government of Ireland, Dublin.
Conrad, K., and T. F. N. Schmidt, 1997: Double Dividend of Climate Protection and the Role of International Policy Coordination in the E.U: An Applied General Equilibrium Model Analysis with the GEM-E3 Model. ZEW Discussion Paper n° 97-26.
Contaldi, M., and G.C. Tosato, 1999: Carbon Tax and its Mitigation Effect through Technology Substitution: An Evaluation for Italy. Proceedings of 22nd IAEE Annual International Conference, Rome, June 9-12, 1999.
Coppel, J., and H. Lee, 1995: Model Simulations: Assumptions and Results. In Global Warming: Economic Dimensions and Policy Responses, OECD, pp. 74-84.
Cornwell, A., and J. Creedy 1996: Carbon Taxation, Prices and Inequality in Australia, Fiscal Studies, 17(3), 21-38.
Council of Economic Advisors, 1998: The Kyoto Protocol and the President’s Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis. Washington, DC.
Criqui, P. and N. Kouvaritakis, 1997: Les coûts pour le secteur énergétique de la réduction des émissions de CO₂: une évaluation avec le modèle POLES. To be published in les actes du Colloque de Fontevraud: Quel environnement au XXIème siècle? Environnement, maîtrise du long-terme et démocratie, 20 pp.
Criqui, P., S. Mima, and L. Viguer, 1999: Marginal Abatement Costs of CO₂ emission Reductions, Geographical Flexibility and Concrete Ceilings: An Assessment Using the POLES Model. Energy Policy, 27(10), 585-602.
Cropper, M., N. Simon, A. Alberini, S. Arora, and P.K. Sharma, 1997: The Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control in Delhi. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(5), 1625-1629.
Danish Economic Council, 1997: Dansk økonomi, efterår 1997 (Danish Economy, Autumn 1997). Danish Economic Council, Copenhagen.
Davis, D., 1997: The Hidden Benefits of Climate Policy: Reducing Fossil Fuel use Saves Lives Now. Environmental Health, Notes 1-6.
Davis, D.L., A. Krupnick, and G. Thurston, 2000: The Ancillary Health Benefits and Costs of GHG Mitigation: Scope, Scale, and Credibility. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Dessus, S., and D. O’Connor, 1999: Climate Policy Without Tears: CGE-Based Ancillary Benefits Estimates for Chile. OECD Development Centre.
Dixit, A., and V. Norman, 1984: Theory of International Trade: A Dual General Equilibrium Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Donovan, D., K. Schneider, G. Tessema, and B. Fisher, 1997: International Climate Change Policy: Impacts on Developing Countries. ABARE Research Report 97.8, Canberra, Australia.
ECON, 1997: Avgiftenes rolle i klimapolitikken (The role of taxes in the climate policy). ECON report n°60/97, ECON Centre for Economic Analysis, Oslo.
Edmonds, J., M. Wise, and D. Barns, 1995: Carbon Coalitions: The Cost and Effectiveness of Energy Agreements to Alter Trajectories of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Energy Policy, 23(4/5), 309-336.
Ekins, P., 1996: How Large a Carbon Tax is justified by the Secondary Benefits of CO₂ Abatement. Resource and Energy Economics, 18(2), 161-187.
Ellerman, A.D., and I. Sue Wing, 2000: Supplementarity: A Invitation for Monopsony, Report n°59, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
EMF-14 (Energy Modelling Forum) Working Group, 1997: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change. The EMF 14 Working Group, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
EMF-16 (Energy Modelling Forum), Working Group 1999: Economic and Energy System Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol: Results from the Energy Modeling Forum Study. The EMF 16 Working Group, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, July 1999.
EIA (Energy Information Administration), 1998: Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity. Washington, US Department of Energy.
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1999: The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1990 to 2010. EPA-410-R-99-001
European Commission, 1999: ExternE: Externalities of Energy. European Commission, DGXII, Science, Research and Development, JOULE.
Farzin, Y., and O. Tahvonen, 1996: Global Carbon Cycle and the Optimal Time Path of a Carbon Tax. Oxford Economic Papers, 48(4), 515-36.
Fitz Gerald, J., and D. McCoy, 1992: The Macroeconomic Implications for Ireland. In The Economic Effects of Carbon Taxes. Policy Research Series, Paper No. 14, J. Fitz Gerald, D. McCoy, (eds.), Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
Frandsen, S.E., J. V. Hansen, and P. Trier, 1995: GESMEC - En generel ligevægtsmodel for Danmark. Dokumentation og anvendelser (GESMEC – An applied general equilibrium model for Denmark – Documentation and applications). The Secretariat of the Economic Council, Copenhagen.
Fortin, E., 1999. Etude des effets redistributifs d’une taxe sur le carbone et l’énergie à l’aide du modèle IMACLIM (Distributive impacts of a Carbon Tax: A Study with the IMACLIM Model). Internal Document, CIRED, France.
Garbaccio, R.F., M.S. Ho and D.W. Jorgenson, 1999: Controlling Carbon Emissions in China. Environment and Development Economics, 4(4 Oct), 493-518
Garbaccio, R.F., M.S. Ho and D.W. Jorgenson, 2000: The Health Benefits of Controlling Carbon Emissions in China. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Gielen, D.J., 1999: The Impact of GHG Emission Reduction on the Western European Materials System. In Material Technologies for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction, D.J.Gielen, (ed), Workshop Proceedings, April 1998, Utrecht. Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten /Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, The Netherlands, 3-16.
Gielen, D.J. and J.H.M. Pieters, 1999: Instruments and Technologies for Climate Change Policy: An Integrated Energy and Materials Systems Modeling Approach. Paris, OECD, Environment Directorate, Environment Policy Committee, ENV/EPOC/GEEI(99)15.
Gielen, D.J., P.R. Koutstaal, T. Kram, and S.N.M. van Rooijen, 1999a: Post-Kyoto: Effects on the Climate Policy of the European Union. In Dealing with Uncertainty Together. Summary of Annex VI (1996-1998). T. Kram (Project Head), International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (ETSAP).
Gielen, D., S. Franssen, A. Seebregts, and T. Kram, 1999b: Markal for Policy Instrument Assessment - The OECD TOG Project. Paper prepared for the IEA/ETSAP Annex VII Workshop, Washington, DC, 1-12.
Gielen, D., T. Kram, and H. Brezet, 1999c: Integrated Energy and Materials Scenarios for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation. Paper prepared for the IEA/DOE/EPA Workshop Technologies to Reduce GHG Emissions: Engineering-Economic Analysis of Conserved Energy and Carbon, Washington, DC, 1-15.
Glomsrød, S., H. Vennemo, and T. Johnsen, 1992: Stabilisation of Emissions of CO₂: A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(1), 53-69.
Glueck, H., and S. Schleicher, 1995: Endogenous Technological Progress Induced by CO₂ Reductions Policies. Environmental and Ressources Economics, 5, 151-153.
Gold, D., A. Damakosh, A. Pope, D. Dockery, W. McDonnell, P Serrano, S. Retama, and M. Castillejos, 1999: Particulate and Ozone Pollutant Effect on the Respiratory Function of Children in Southwest Mexico City. Epidemiology, 10(1), 8-17.
Golombek, R., C. Hagem, and M. Hoel, 1995: Efficient Incomplete International Climate Agreements. Resource-and-Energy-Economics, 17(1), 25-46.
Gørtz, M., J.V., Hansen, and M. Larsen, 1999: CO₂-skatter, dobbelt-dividende og konkurrence i energietekorten. Anvendelser af den danske AGL-model ECOSMEC (CO₂ taxes, double dividend and competition in the energy sector: Applications of the Danish CGE model ECOSMEC). Arbejdpapir, 1.
Goulder, L.H., 1995a: Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 271-297.
Goulder, L.H., 1995b: Environmental Taxation and The Double Dividend: A Reader’s Guide.International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 157-183.
Goulder, L. H., and S. H. Schneider, 1999: Induced Technological Change and the Attractiveness of CO₂ Abatement Policies. Resource and Energy Economics, 21, 211-253.
Goulder, L. H. and K. Mathai, 2000: Optimal CO₂ Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 1-38.
Goulder, L.H., I.W.H. Parry, and D. Burtraw, 1997: Revenue-Raising versus Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Pre-Existing Tax Distortions. RAND Journal of Economics, Winter.
Goulder, L.H., I.W.H. Parry, C, Roberton, C. Williams III, and D. Burtraw, 1999: The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-best Setting. Journal of Public Economics, 72 (3), 329-360.
Grubb, M., 1997. Technologies, Energy Systems and the Timing of CO₂ Abatement: An Overview of Economic Issues. Energy Policy, 25, 159-172.
Grubb, M., 2000: Economic Dimensions of Technological and Global Responses to the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Economic Studies, 27(1/2), 111-125
Grubb, M., T. Chapuis, and M. Ha Duong, 1995: The Economics of Changing Course: Implications of Adaptability and Inertia for Optimal Climate Policy. Energy Policy, 23(4/5).
Grubb, M., C. Vrolijk, and D. Brack, 1999: The Kyoto Protocol, a guide and assessment. The Royal Institute of International Affairs and Earthscan Publ., London.
Grübler, A., and S. Messner, 1998: Technological Change and the timing of Mitigation Measures. Energy Economics, 20, 495-512.
Güllen, G., 1996: Is OPEC a Cartel? Evidence from Co-integration and Causality Tests. Energy Journal, 17(2), 43-57.
Ha-Duong, M., M. Grubb, and J-C. Hourcade, 1997: Influence of Socio-economic Inertia and Uncertainty on Optimal CO₂ Emission Abatement. Nature, 390, 270-273.
Ha-Duong, M., J-C. Hourcade and F. Lecocq, 1999: Dynamic Consistency Problems behind the Kyoto Protocol. Int.J. Environment and Pollution, 11(4), 426-446.
Hagler Bailly, 1995: Final Report prepared by Hagler Bailly Consulting, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, under subcontract to ICF Incorporated, Fairfax, VI for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Acid Rain Division.
Håkonsen, L., and L. Mathiesen, 1997: CO₂-Stabilization May Be a ‘No-Regrets’ Policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(2), 171-98.
Halsnaes, K., and A. Markandya, 1999: Comparative Assessment of GHG Limitation Costs and Ancillary Benefits in Country Studies for DCs and EITs. Working Paper, UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Denmark, June, 1-20.
Hamilton, K., and C. Cameron, 1994: Simulating the Distributional Effects of a Carbon Tax. Canadian Public Policy, 20, 385-399.
Harrison, G. W., and B. Kriström, 1999: General Equilibrium Effects of Increasing Carbon Taxes in Sweden. In Green Taxes - Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence from Scandinavia. R. Brännlund, I-M. Gren, (eds.), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Harrison, G.W., and T. Rutherford, 1999: Burden sharing, joint implementation and carbon coalitions. In International Agreements on Climate Change, C. Carraro, (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Hauch, J., 1999: Elephant – A Simulation Model for Environmental Regulation at Nordic Energy Markets. PhD thesis, Danish Economic Council, Copenhagen.
Hertel, T., (ed.), 1997: Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 403 pp.
Hill, M. 1999: Green Tax Reforms in Sweden: The Second Dividend and the Cost of Tax Exemptions. Beijer Discussion Paper Series No. 119, Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
Hinchy, M., K. Hanslow, and B. Fisher, 1998: Gains from International Emissions Trading in a General Equilibrium Framework. ABARE Working Paper.
Hoel, M., and S. Kverndokk, 1996: Depletion of fossil fuels and the impacts of global warming. Resource and Energy Economics, 18(2), 115-136.
Hotelling, H., 1931: The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Journal of Political Economy, 39, 137-175.
Hourcade, J-C., K. Heloui, and F. Ghersi. 2000a: Les déterminants du double dividende d’écotaxes : Rôle du changement technique et du risque d’embauche (The Determinants of Double Dividend: The Importance of Technical Change and Employment Risk). Economie et Prévisions, 143-144, 47-68.
Hourcade, J-C., P. Courtois, and T. Lepesant, 2000b: Socio-economic of Policy Formation and Choices. In Climate Change and European Leadership. J. Gupta, M. Grubb. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Huff, K., and T. Hertel, 1996: Decomposing Welfare Changes in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 5, Purdue University, USA, 80 pp.
IAT (Interagency Analytical Team), 1997: Climate Change Economic Analysis. Technical Annex. Markal-Macro Modeling Analysis Supporting the Interagency Analytical Team: Methodology, Technology Assumptions and Results.
Interlaboratory Working Group, 1997: Scenarios of US Carbon Reductions: Potential Impacts of Energy efficient and Low Carbon Technologies by 2010 and beyond. Oakridge and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, CA, ORNL-444 and LBNL-40533.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1995: Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios. J.T. Houghton et al., (eds.), Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1996: Climate Change 1995. Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IPCC, 2000: Emissions scenarios. A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jaccard, M., A. Bailie, and J. Nyboer, 1996: CO₂ Emission Reduction Costs in the Residential Sector: Behavioral Parameters in a Bottom-up Simulation Model. The Energy Journal, 17(4), 107-134.
Jacoby, H., R. Eckaus, D. Ellerman, R. Prinn, D. Reiner, and Z. Yang, 1997: CO₂ Emission Limits: Economic Adjustments and the Distribution of Burdens. The Energy Journal, 18(3), 31-58.
Jaffe, B., and R. N. Stavins, 1994: The Energy-Efficiency gap. What does it mean?. Energy Policy, 22(10) 804-810.
Jensen, J., 1998: Carbon Abatement Policies with Assistance to Energy Intensive Industry. Working paper No 2/98, The MobiDK Project, The Ministry of Business and Industry, Copenhagen.
Jensen, J., and T. N. Rasmussen, 1998: Allocation of CO₂ Emission Permits: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments. The MobiDK Project, Ministry of Business and Industry, Copenhagen.
Jerkkola, J., J. , and J. Pohjola, 1993: A CGE Model for Finnish Environmental and Energy Policy Analysis: Effects of Stabilizing CO₂ Emissions. Discussion papers No. 5, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki.
Jiang, K., X. Hu, Y. Matsuoka, and T. Morita, 1998: Energy Technology Changes and CO₂ Emission Scenarios in China. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1(2), 141-160.
Jochem, E., 1998: Policy Scenarios 2005 and 2020 – Using Results of Bottom-Up Models for Policy Design in Germany. Working Paper, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 1-4.
Johnsen, T.A., B. M. Larsen, and H. T. Mysen, 1996: Economic impacts of a CO₂ tax. In MSG-EE: An Applied General Equilibrium Model for Energy and Environmental Analyses. K. H. Alfsen, T. Bye, E. Holmøy, (eds.), Social and Economic Studies 96, Statistics Norway.
Jorgenson, D.W., 1997: How Economics Can Inform the Climate Change Debate. AEI Conference Summaries, May 1997, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. (http://www.aei.org/cs/cs7755.htm.).
Jorgenson, D.W., and P.J. Wilcoxen, 1995: Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment. In Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Costs and Policy Options. D. Gaskins, J. Weyant, (eds.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (forthcoming).
Kainuma, M., Y. Matsuoka, T. Morita, and G. Hibino, 1999: Development of an End-Use Model for Analyzing Policy Options to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part C: Applications and Reviews, 29(3 –August), 317-323.
Kainuma, M., Y. Matsuoka, and T. Morita, 2000: The AIM/End-Use Model and its Application to Forecast Japanese Carbon Dioxide Emissions. European Journal of Operational Research.
Kanudia, A., and R. Loulou 1998a: Robust Responses to Climate Change via Stochastic MARKAL: The Case of Québec. European Journal of Operations Research, 106, 15-30.
Keohane, R. and J.S. Nye, 1998: Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign-Affairs; 77(5), pp. 81-94.
Kline, S., and N. Rosenberg, 1986: An Overview of Innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology For Economic Growth. R. Landau, N. Rosenberg (eds.), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275-305.
Koomey, J., C. Richey, S. Laitner, R. Markel, and C. Marnay, 1998: Technology and GHG Amissions: An Integrated Analysis using the LBNL-NEMS Model. Technical Report LBNL-42054, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
Kram, T., 1999a: Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme-ETSAP: History, the ETSAP Kyoto Statement and Post-Kyoto Analysis. In Energy Models for Decision Support: New Challenges and Possible Solution, Proceedings of conference in Berlin, May 4-5, 1998, Laege and Schaumann, (eds.), OECD, ETSAP, pp. 23-42.
Kram, T. (Project Head), 1999b: Dealing with Uncertainty Together. Summary of Annex VI (1996-1998). International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (ETSAP), 83 pp.
Krause, F., 1995: Cutting Carbon Emissions: Burden or Benefit? Executive Summary. In Energy Policy in the Greenhouse, IPSEP.
Krause, F., 1996: The Costs of Mitigating Carbon Emissions: A Review of Methods and Findings from European Studies. Energy Policy, Special Issue on the Second UN IPCC Assessment Report, Working Group III, 24 (10/11), 899-915.
Krause, F., J. Koomey, and D. Olivier, 1999: Cutting Carbon Emissions while Saving Money: Low Risk Strategies for the European Union. Executive Summary.In Energy Policy in the Greenhouse, Vol. II, Part 2, IPSEP, International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths, El Cerrito, CA, November, 33 pp.
Krupnick, A., D. Burtraw, and A. Markandya, 2000: The Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Climate Change Mitigation: A conceptual Framework. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Kverndokk, S., and K. E. Rosendahl, 2000: CO₂ Mitigation Costs And Ancillary Benefits in the Nordic Countries, the UK and Ireland: A survey. Memorandum 34/2000, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Kydes, A.S., 1999: Energy Intensity and Carbon Emission Responses to Technological Change: The U.S. Outlook. The Energy Journal, 20(3), 93-121.
Kypreos, S., 1998: The Global MARKAL-MACRO Trade Model. In Energy Models for Decision Support: New Challenges and Possible Solutions, Conference Proceedings, Berlin, May 4-5, 1998, Laege and Schaumann, (eds),. Paris, OECD, ETSAP, pp. 99-112.
Kypreos, S., and L. Barreto, 1999: A Simple Global Electricity MARKAL Model with Endogenous Learning. Villigen, Paul Scherrer Institute, General Energy Research Department-ENE, Energy Modeling Group, 24 pp.
Kypreos, S., Barreto, L., Capros, P. and Messner, S., 2000: ERIS: A model prototype with endogenous technological change, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 14(1,2,3,4):374-397.
Laffont, J.J., and J. Tirole, 1993: A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Laitner, J.A., 1997: The Benefits of Technology Investment as a Climate Change Policy. Proceedings of the 18th North American Conference of the USAEE/IAEE, September 7-10, San Francisco, CA.
Laitner, J.A., 1999: Modeling the Influences of Technology Policy, Organizational Structure, and Market Characteristics on the Economic Evaluation of Climate Change Policies. Proceedings of ACEEE Industrial Summer Study, Saratoga Springs, NY. June.
La Rovere, E.L., L.F.L. Legey, and J.D.G. Miguez, 1994: Alternative Energy Strategies for Abatement of Carbon Emissions in Brazil. Energy Policy, 22(11), pp. 914-924.
Larsson, T., P.E. Grohnheit and, F. Unander, 1998: Common Action and Electricity Trade in Northern Europe. International Transactions in Operational Research, 5(1), 3-11.
LEAP, 1995: Use Guide for Version 95 of the LEAP Model. Tellus Institute, Boston Centre, Boston, MA.
Lecocq, F., J-C. Hourcade, and T. Lepesant, 1999: Equity, Uncertainty and the Robustness of Entitlement Rules. IIASA, EMF, IEA Conference on Energy Modelling, Paris, June 16-18.
Lee, R., A.J. Krupnick, D. Burtraw, et al., 1995: Estimating Externalities of Electric Fuel Cycles: Analytical Methods and Issues and Estimating Externalities of Coal Fuel Cycles. McGraw-Hill/Utility Data Institute, Washington, DC.
Lindholt, L., 1999: Beyond Kyoto: CO₂ Permit Prices and the Markets for Fossil Fuels. Discussion Paper 258, Statistics Norway, Oslo, 45pp.
Linn, W. S., Y. Szlachcic, H. Gong, Jr., P. L. Kinney and K. T. Berhane, 2000. Air pollution and Daily Hospital Admissions in Metropolitan Los Angeles. Occup Environ Med 57(7), pp 477-483.
Lloyd, P. 1994: Aggregation by industry in high-dimensional models. Review of International Economics, 2(2), 97-111.
Loulou, R., and D. Lavigne, 1996: MARKAL Model with Elastic Demands: Application to GHG Emission Control. In Operations Research and Environmental Engineering. C. Carraro, A. Haurie (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 201-220.
Loulou. R., and A. Kanudia, 1998: The Kyoto Protocol, Inter-Provincial Cooperation and Energy Trading: A Systems Analysis with Integrated MARKAL Models. Energy Studies Review.
Loulou, R., and A. Kanudia, 1999a. The Regional and Global Economic Analysis of GHG Mitigation Issue via Technology-Rich Models: A North American Example. International Modelling Conference, Paris, 15-17 June 1999, IEA/EMF/IIASA, 27 pp.
Loulou, R., and A. Kanudia, 1999b: Minimax Regret Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Abatement: Methodology and Application. Operations Research Letters.
Loulou, R., A. Kanudia, and D. Lavigne, 1998: GHG Abatement in Central Canada with Inter-provincial Cooperation. Energy Studies Review, 8(2), 120-129 (This volume is dated 1996, but appeared in January 1998).
Loulou, R., A. Kanudia, M. Labriet, K. Vaillancourt, and M. Margolick, 2000: Integration of GHG Abatement Options for Canada with the MARKAL Model. Report prepared for the National Process on Climate Change and the Analysis and Modelling Group, Canadian Government, 232 pp.
Lvovsky, K. and G. Hughes, 1997: An Approach to Projecting Ambient Concentrations of SO₂ and PM-10. Unpublished Annex 3.2 to World Bank (1997).
Manne, A.S., and J. Oliveira-Martins, 1994: Comparisons of model structure and policy scenarios: GREEN and 12RT. Draft, Annex to the WP1 Paper on Policy Response to the Threat of Global Warming, OECD Model Comparison Project (II), OECD, Paris.
Martin, J.B., J-M. Burniaux, and O. Martins, 1992: The Costs of International Agreements to Reduce CO₂ Emissions: Evidence from Green. OECD Journal Studies, 19 (Winter).
McDougall, R., and P. Dixon, 1996: Analysing the Economy-wide Effects of an Energy Tax: Results for Australia from the ORANI-E Model. In Greenhouse: Coping with Climate Change. W. Bouma, G. Pearman, M. Manning, (eds.), CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia.
McKibbin, W., and P. Wilcoxen, 1995: The Theoretical and Empirical Structure of the G-Cubed Model. Brookings: Discussion Papers. International Economics, 118.
McKibbin, W., M. Ross, R. Shackleton, and P. Wilcoxen, 1999: Emissions Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal (Special Issue), 287-333.
Messner, S., 1995. Endogenized Technological Learning in an Energy Systems Model. I.I.A.S.A. Working Paper WP-95-114, Laxenburg, Austria.
Messner, S., 1997: Endogenized Technological Learning in an Energy Systems Model. Journal of Evolutionary-Economics; 7(3), pp. 291-313.
Mielnik, O., and J. Goldemberg, 2000: Converging to a Common Pattern of Energy Use in Developing and Industrialised Countries. Energy Policy, 23(8), 503-508.
Mongia, N., Sathaye, J., Mongia, P., 1994: Energy Use and Carbon Implications in India. Energy Policy, 22(11), pp. 894-906.
Morgenstern, R.D., 2000: Baseline Issues in the Estimation of the Ancillary Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Nakicenovic, N., 1997: Technological Change and Learning. Perspectives in Energy, Quarterly of Moscow International Energy Club and the International Academy of Energy, 4(2), 173-189.
Navrud, S. 1994: Economic valuation of the external costs of fuel cycles. Testing the benefit transfer approach.. In Models for Integrated Electricity Resource Planning, A.T. Almeida, (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 49-66.
Nilsson, C., 1999: Unilateral versus Multilateral Carbon Dioxide Tax Implementations - A Numerical Analysis with the European Model - GEM-E3. Preliminary Version. National Institute of Economic Research, Stockholm.
Nystrom, I., and C. Wene, 1999: Energy-Economy Linking in MARKAL-MACRO: Interplay of Nuclear, Conservation and CO₂ Policies in Sweden. Working Paper. Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.
O’Donoghue, C., 1997: Carbon Dioxide, Energy Taxes and Household Income. Working paper 90, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1995: Climate Change, Economic Instruments and Income Distribution, OECD, Paris.
OECD, 2000: Ancillary benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Proceedings of an IPCC Co-sponsored Workshop, 27-29 March 2000, Washington, DC.
Office of the President of the United States, 1998: The Kyoto Protocol and the President’s Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis, July 1998.
Oliveira-Martins, J. and P. Sturn, 1998: Efficiency and Distribution in Computable Models of Carbon Emission Abatement. Economics Department Working Papers (OECD).
Oliveira-Martins, J., J-M. Burniaux, and J.P. Martin, 1992: Trade and The Effectiveness of Unilateral CO₂ -Abatement Policies: Evidence from GREEN. OECD Economic Studies(19), 123-140.
Olson, M., 1965: Logic of collective action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ostertag, K., 1999: Transaction Costs of Raising Energy Efficiency. Working Paper, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI)/Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Development (CIRED), Karlsruhe, Germany/Nogent sur Marne, France, February 1999, pp. 1-15.
Ostro, B.D. 1996: A Methodology for Estimating Air Pollution Health Effects. Office of Global and Integrated Environmental Health, World Health Organization, Geneva.
Palmer, K., W. Oats, and P. Portney, 1995: Tightening Environmental Standards: the Benefit-Cost or the No Cost Paradigm. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132.
Parry, I.W.H., 1997: Environmental Taxes and Quotas in the Presence of Distorting Taxes in Factor Markets. Resource and Energy Economics 19, 203-220.
Parry, I.W.H., and A.M. Bento, 2000: Tax-Deductions, Environmental Policy and the ‘Double Dividend’ Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39 (1), 67-96.
Parry, I.W.H., R. Williams, and L.H. Goulder, 1999: When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, January.
Pearce, D.,1992: The Secondary Benefits Of Greenhouse Gas Control. Working Paper GEC 92-12, CSERGE, University College London and University of East Anglia, UK.
Pearce, D., 2000: Policy Frameworks for the Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Policies. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Pechan, E.H. & Associates, 1997. Estimating Global Energy Policy Effects on Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations. Pechan Report No. 10.001/2116.
Pereira, L., D. Loomis, G. Conceicao, A. Braga, R. Arcas, H.kishi, J. Songer, G. Bohm, and P. Saldiva, 1998: Association between Air Pollution and Intrauterine Mortality in Sao Paulo Brazil. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106, 325-329.
Pezzey, J., 1992: Analysis of Unilateral CO₂ Control in the European Community and OECD. The Energy Journal, 13(3), 159-71.
Pizer, W., 1997: Prices versus Quantities revisited: the Case of Climate Change. RFF Discussion Paper 98-02. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Pope III, C. A., M. J. Thun, et al., 1995: Particulate Air Pollution as a Predictor of Mortality in a Prospective Study of U.S. adults. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 151, 669-674.
Porter, M., and C. van der Linde, 1995: Towards a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Poterba, J., 1991: Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming : On Designing a Carbon Tax. In Global Warming : Economic Policy Responses. R. Dornbush, J.M. Poterba, (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Proost, S., and D van Regemorter, 1995: The Double Dividend and the role of Inequality Aversion and Macroeconomic Regimes. International Taxes and Public Finances, 2, 217-219.
Read, P., 1999: Cooperative Implementation After Kyoto: Joint Implementation and the Need for Commercialized Offsets Trading. In On the Compatibility of Flexible Instruments. C. Jepma, W. van der Gaast, (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Reilly, J., R. Prinn, J. Harnisch, J. Fitzmaurice, H. Jacoby, D. Kicklighter, J. Melillo, P. Stone, A. Sokolov, and C. Wang. 1999: Multi-Gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol. Nature, 401, 549-555.
Rothman, D.S., 2000: Estimating Ancillary Impacts, Benefits, and Costs on Ecosystems from Proposed GHG Mitigation Policies. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Sathaye, J., and N.H. Ravindranath, 1998: Climate Change Mitigation in the Energy and Forestry sectors of developing countries. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 23, 387-437.
Sato, O., M. Shimoda, K. Tatemasu, and Y. Tadokoro, 1999: Roles of Nuclear Energy in Japan’s Future Energy System. English summary of the JAERI technical paper 99-015, March.
Scheraga, J.D. and N.A. Leary, 1993: Costs and Side Benefits of using Energy Taxes to Mitigate Global Climate Change. Proceedings 1993 National Tax Journal, pp. 133-138.
Schubert, K. , and O. Beaumais, 1998: Fiscalité, marché de droits à polluer et équilibre général: application à la France. In L’environnement , une nouvelle dimension de l’analyse économique. K. Schubert, P. Zagamé, (eds), Vuibert, France
Schneider, S.H., and L.H. Goulder, 1997: Achieving Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reductions at Low Cost. Nature, 389, 4 September.
Seebregts, A.J., T. Kram, G.J. Schaeffer, and A.J.M. Bos, 1999a: Modelling Technological Progress in a MARKAL Model for Western Europe including Clusters of Technologies. European IAEE/AEE Conference: Technological Progress and the Energy Challenge, Paris, 30 Sept -1 Oct 1999, 16 pp.
Seebregts, A., T. Kram, G. Schaeffer, A. Stoffer, S. Kypreos, L. Barreto, S. Messner and L. Schrattenholzer, 1999b: Endogenous Technological Change in Energy System Models - A Synthesis of Experience with ERIS, MARKAL, and MESSAGE. Working Paper, ECN-C-99-025, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Petten, The Netherlands, April, pp. 1-29.
Shackleton, R., M. Shelby, A. Cristofaro, R. Brinner, J. Yanchar, L. Goulder, D. Jorgenson, P. Wilcoxen, and P. Pauly, 1996: The Efficiency Value of Carbon Tax Revenues. In Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Costs and Policy Options. D. Gaskin, J. Weyant, (eds.), Energy Modelling Forum, Stanford, CA.
Shackleton, R., 1998: The Potential Effects of International Carbon Emission Permit Trading Under the Kyoto Protocol. OECD Experts Workshop on Climate Change and Economic Modelling : Background Analysis for the Kyoto Protocol, Room Document n°8.
Shukla, P.R., 1996: The Modelling of Policy Options for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in India. Ambio, 24(4), 240-248.
Sinclair, P., 1992: High does nothing and rising is worse: Carbon Taxes should keep Declining to Cut Harmful Emissions. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 60(1), 41-52.
Smith, S., 1998: Distibutional Incidence of Environmental Taxes on Energy and Carbon: A Review of Policy Issues. Paper presented at Colloque du Ministere de l’Environnnement et de l’Amenagement du Territoire, Toulouse, 13 May 1998.
Symons, E., J. Proops, and P. Gay, 1994: Carbon Taxes, Consumer Demand and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Simulation Analysis for the UK. Fiscal Studies, 15(2), 9-43.
Tahvonen, O., 1997: Fossil fuels, stock externalities and backstop technology. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(4), 855-874.
Tseng, P., J. Lee, S. Kypreos, and L. Barreto, 1999: Technology Learning and the Role of Renewable Energy in Reducing Carbon Emissions. International Workshop on Technologies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Engineering-Economic Analysis of Conserved Energy and Carbon, Washington, May, 1999.
Tulpulé, V., S. Brown, J. Lim, C. Polidano, H. Pant, and B. Fisher, 1999: An Economic Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol Using the Global Trade and Environment Model. The Energy Journal (Special Issue) 257-285.
Ulph, A., and D. Ulph, 1994. The Optimal Time Path of a Carbon Tax. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(5), 857-868.
UNEP, 1994a: UNEP GHG Abatement Costing Studies. Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark.
UNEP, 1994b: UNEP Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costing Studies. Part One: Main Report. UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark.
UNEP, 1999a: Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Argentina.
1999b. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Ecuador
1999c. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Botswana
1999d. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Zambia
1999e. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Vietnam.
1999f. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Hungary.
1999g. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Estonia.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark.
Unger, T., and L. Alm, 1999: Electricity and Emission – Permits trade as a Means of Curbing CO₂ Emissions in the Nordic Countries. Working Paper, Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.
Van der Mensbrugghe, D., 1998: A (Preliminary) Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol: Using the OECD GREEN Model. In Economic Modelling of Climate Change, OECD, Paris, pp. 173-204.
Verikios, G. and K. Hanslow, 1999: Modelling the Effects of Implementing the Uruguay Round: A Comparison Using the GTAP Model under Alternative Treatments of International Capital Mobility. Paper presented to the Second Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Denmark, June 20-22, 1999.
Von Hippel, D., and B. Granada, 1993: Application of the LEAP/EDB Energy/Environment Planning System. SEI, Boston, MA..
Wang, X., and K. Smith, 1999: Near-term Health Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Reductions: A Proposed Assessment Method and Application in Two Energy Sectors of China. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Weitzman, M.L., 1974: Prices versus Quantities. Review of Economic Studies, 41(4), 477-491.
Welsch, H. and F. Hoster, 1995: A General Equilibrium Analysis of European Carbon/Energy Taxation – Model Structure and Macroeconomic Results. Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (ZWS), 115, 275-303.
b, J., 1999: The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation. Special Issue of the Energy Journal. John Weyant (ed.).
Weyant, J., and T. Olavson, 1999: Issues in Modeling Induced Technological Change in Energy, Environment, and Climate Policy. Journal of Environmental Management and Assessment, 1, 67-85.
Wigley, T., R. Richels, and J. Edmonds, 1996: Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilization of Atmospheric CO₂ Concentrations. Nature, 379, 240-243.
Williamson, O.,1996: The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford University Press, New York, USA and Oxford, UK.
Working Group on Public Health and Fossil Fuel Combustion, 1997: Short-term Improvements in Public Health from Global Climate Policies on Fossil Fuel Combustion: An Interim Report. Lancet, 1341-1348.
Wu, Z., J. He, A., Zhang, Q. Xu, S. Zhang, and J. Sathaye, 1994: A Macro Assessment of Technology Options for CO₂ Mitigation in China’s Energy System. Energy Policy, 22(11), pp. 907-913.
Ybema, J.R., M. Menkveld and T. Kram, 1998: Securing Flexibility in the Energy System to meet Future CO₂ Reduction: An Inventory of hedging options.Third Modelling Seminar on Uncertainty and Policy Choices to Meet UNFCCC Objectives, Paris, October 16-17, 1997, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten.
Ybema, J.R., P. Lako, I. Kok, E. Schol, D.J. Gielen, and T. Kram, 1999: Scenarios for Western Europe on Long Term Abatement of CO₂ Emissions. Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten/Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, 109 pp.
Zhang, Z.X., 1997: The Economics of Energy Policy in China: Implications for Global Climate Change, New Horizons in Environmental Economics Series. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Zhang, Z.X., 1998: Macroeconomic Effects of CO₂ Emission Limits: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for China. Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(2), 213-250.

IPCC Homepage