REPORTS ASSESSMENT REPORTS

Working Group III: Mitigation


Other reports in this collection

11 Gaps in Knowledge

Important gaps in own knowledge on which additional research could be useful to support future assessments include:

  • Further exploration of the regional, country, and sector specific potentials of technological and social innovation options, including:

    • The short, medium, and long-term potential and costs of both CO2 and non-CO2, non-energy mitigation options;
    • Understanding of technology diffusion across different regions;
    • Identifying opportunities in the area of social innovation leading to decreased greenhouse gas emissions;
    • Comprehensive analysis of the impact of mitigation measures on C flows in and out of the terrestrial system; and
    • Some basic inquiry in the area of geo-engineering.

  • Economic, social, and institutional issues related to climate change mitigation in all countries. Priority areas include:

    • Much more analysis of regionally specific mitigation options, barriers, and policies is recommended as these are conditioned by the regions’ mitigative capacity;
    • The implications of mitigation on equity;
    • Appropriate methodologies and improved data sources for climate change mitigation and capacity building in the area of integrated assessment;
    • Strengthening future research and assessments, especially in developing countries.

  • Methodologies for analysis of the potential of mitigation options and their cost, with special attention to comparability of results. Examples include:

    • Characterizing and measuring barriers that inhibit greenhouse gas-reducing action;
    • Make mitigation modelling techniques more consistent, reproducible, and accessible;
    • Modelling technology learning; improving analytical tools for evaluating ancillary benefits, e.g. assigning the costs of abatement to greenhouse gases and to other pollutants;
    • Systematically analyzing the dependency of costs on baseline assumptions for various greenhouse gas stabilization scenarios;
    • Developing decision analytical frameworks for dealing with uncertainty as well as socio-economic and ecological risk in climate policymaking;
    • Improving global models and studies, their assumptions, and their consistency in the treatment and reporting of non-Annex I countries and regions.

  • Evaluating climate mitigation options in the context of development, sustainability, and equity. Examples include:

    • More research is needed on the balance of options in the areas of mitigation and adaptation and of the mitigative and adaptive capacity in the context of DES;
    • Exploration of alternative development paths including sustainable consumption patterns in all sectors, including the transportation sector, and integrated analysis of mitigation and adaptation;
    • Identifying opportunities for synergy between explicit climate policies and general policies promoting sustainable development;
    • Integration of inter- and intragenerational equity in climate change mitigation studies;
    • Implications of equity assessments;
    • Analysis of scientific, technical, and economic aspects of implications of options under a wide variety of stabilization regimes;
    • Determining what kinds of policies interact with what sorts of socio-economic conditions to result in futures characterized by low CO2 emissions;
    • Investigation on how changes in societal values may be encouraged to promote sustainable development; and
    • Evaluating climate mitigation options in the context of and for synergy with potential or actual adaptive measures.

  • Development of engineering-economic, end-use, and sectoral studies of GHG emissions mitigation potentials for specific regions and/or countries of the world, focusing on:

    • Identification and assessment of mitigation technologies and measures that are required to deviate from “business-as-usual” in the short term (2010, 2020);
    • Development of standardized methodologies for quantifying emissions reductions and costs of mitigation technologies and measures;
    • Identification of barriers to the implementation of the mitigation technologies and measures;
    • Identification of opportunities to increase adoption of GHG emissions mitigation technologies and measures through connections with ancillary benefits as well as furtherance of the DES goals; and
    • Linking the results of the assessments to specific policies and programmes that can overcome the identified barriers as well as leverage the identified ancillary benefits.

Other reports in this collection

IPCC Homepage