REFERENCES
Ackermann, T., G. Andersson, and L. Söder, 2001: Overview of government and market driven programs for the promotion of renewable power generation. Renewable Energy, 22(1-3), January-March 2001, pp. 197-204.
Ahman, M., D. Burtraw, J. Kruger, and L. Zetterberg, 2006: A ten year rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances. Energy Policy.
Akhurst, M., J. Morgheim, and R. Lewis, 2003: Greenhouse gas emissions trading in BP. Energy Policy, 31(7), June 2003, pp. 657-663.
Aldy, J.E., S. Barrett, and R.N. Stavins, 2003: Thirteen plus one: a comparison of global climate policy architectures. Climate Policy, 3(4), December 2003, pp. 373-397.
Alic, J.A., D.C. Mowery, E.S. Rubin, 2003: U.S. Technology and Innovation Policies: Lessons for Climate Change. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington, D.C.
Allen, M., 2003: Liability for Climate Change: Will it ever be possible to sue anyone for damaging the climate? Commentary in Nature, 421, 27 February 2003, pp. 891-89.
Anderson, D., C.D. Bird, 1992: Carbon accumulations and technical progress - A simulation study of costs. Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54(1), pp. 1-27, Oxford.
Andresen, S. and J. Wettestad, 1992: International resource cooperation and the greenhouse problem. Global Environmental Change, Human and Policy Dimensions, 2(4), December 1992, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 277-291.
Andronova, N.G. and M.E. Schlesinger, 2004: Importance of sulfate aerosol in evaluating the relative contributions of regional emissions to the historical global temperature change. Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies for Global Change, 9, pp. 383-390.
Arora, S. and T. Cason, 1996: Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding Participation in EPA’s 33/50 Program. Land Economics, 72, pp. 413-32.
Asheim, G.B., W. Buchholz, and B. Tungodden, 2001: Justifying sustainability. In Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, pp. 252-268.
Aslam, M.A., 2002: Equal per capita entitlements: a key to global participation on climate change? K.A. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, and J.F. Perkaus (eds), Options for protecting the climate (pp. 175-201). Washington, WRI.
Assunção, L., and Z.X. Zhang, 2002: Domestic climate policies and the WTO. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Discussion Paper No. 164.
Azar, C. and H. Dowlatabadi, 1999: A review of technical change in assessment of climate policy. Annual Review Energy Economics, 24, pp.513-544.
Babiker, M.H., R.S. Eckhaus 2002: Rethinking the Kyoto targets. Climatic Change, 54, pp. 99-114.
Babiker, M., L., P. Criqui, A.D. Ellerman, J. Reilly and L. Viguier, 2003: Assessing the impact of carbon tax differentiation in the European Union. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8(3), pp. 187-197.
Baer, P., J. Harte, B. Haya, A.V. Herzog, J. Holdren, N.E. Hultman, D.M. Kammen, R.B. Norgaard, and L. Raymond, 2000: Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science, 289 (2287.12 Discussion paper 2003-2).
Bailey, P., T. Jackson, S. Parkinson, and K. Begg, 2001: Searching for baselines constructing joint implementation project emission reductions. Global Environmental Change, 11, pp.185-192.
Bakker, S.J.A., H.C. de Coninck, and J.C. Jansen, 2004: Air pollution, health and climate change. M.T.J. Kok and H.C. de Coninck (ed.), Beyond Climate: Options for Broadening Climate Policy, RIVM Report 500036 001, Bilthoven, pp. 139-171.
Bals, C., I. Burton, S. Butzengeiger, A. Dlugolecki, E.Gurenko, E. Hoekstra, P. Höppe, R. Kumar, J. Linnerooth-Bayer, R. Mechler, and K. Warner, 2005: Insurance-related options for adaptation to climate change, the Munich Climate Insurance Initiative (MCII). <http://www.germanwatch.org/rio/c11insur.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
Baron, R. and C. Philibert, 2005: Act Locally, Trade Globally: Emissions Trading for Climate. International Energy Agency, 2005, Paris.
Baron, R. and J. Ellis, 2006: Sectoral crediting mechanisms for greenhouse gas mitigation: institutional and operational issues. OECD/IEA Annex I Group, Paris.
Baron, R. and S. Bygrave (2002). ”Towards International Emissions Trading: Design Implication for Linkages”. Paper presented at the 3rd CATEP Workshop on Global Trading, Kiel Institute for World Economics, 30 September - 1 October 2002.
Barrett, S., 2001: Towards a better climate treaty. Policy matters. World Economics, 3(2), pp. 35-45.
Barrett, S., 2003: Environment and Statecraft. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Baumert, K., A.R. Bhandari, N. Kete, 1999: What might a developing country climate commitment look like? World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.
Baumert, K., T. Herzog, and J. Pershing, 2005a: Navigating the numbers: Greenhouse gases and international climate change agreements. World Resources Institute, Washington D.C., USA, ISBN: 1-56973-599-9.
Baumert, K., R. Bradley, N.K. Dubach, J.R. Moreira, S. Mwakasonda, W.-S. Ng, L.A. Horta Nogueira, V. Parente, J. Pershing, L. Schipper, and H. Winkler, 2005b: Growing in the greenhouse: Policies and measures for sustainable development while protecting the climate. Washington, USA, World Resources Institute.
Begg, K. and D. van der Horst, 2004: Preserving environmental integrity in standardised baselines: The role of additionality and uncertainty. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, pp. 180-200.
Beierle, T.C., 2004: The benefits and costs of environmental information disclosure: What do we know about right-to-know? RFF Discussion Paper 03-05, March.
Bell, R. and C. Russell, 2002: Environmental policy for developing countries. Issues in Science and Technology. Spring, pp. 63-70.
Bell, R.G., 2003: Choosing environmental policy instruments in the real world. OECD: Paris.
Benedick, R.E., 1993: Perspectives of a negotiation practioner. Sjostedt, G. (ed.) International Environment Negotiation, IIASA, pp. 219-243.
Benedick, R., 2001: Striking a new deal on climate change. Science and Technology Online, Fall 2001.
Berk, M.M. and M.G.J. den Elzen, 2001: Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals. Climate Policy, 1, pp. 465-480.
Berkhout, F. and A. Smith, 2003: Carbon flows between the EU and Eastern Europe: Baselines, scenarios and policy options. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 3, pp. 199-219.
Betz, R., W. Eichhammer, and J. Schleich, 2004: Designing national allocation plans for EU emissions trading - A first analysis of the outcomes. Energy & Environment, 15, pp. 375-425.
Betz, R. and I. MacGill, 2005: Emissions trading for Australia: Design, transition and linking options. CEEM Discussion Paper, DP_050815.
Biermann, F. and R. Brohm, 2005: Border adjustments on energy taxes: A possible tool for european policymakers in implementing the Kyoto Protocol? In Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung. 74, pp. 249-258.
Blackman, A. and W. Harrington, 2000: The use of economic incentives in developing countries: Lessons from international experience with industrial air pollution. Journal of Environment and Development, 9(1), pp. 5-44.
Blanchard, O., 2002: Scenarios for differentiating commitments. K.A. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa and J.F. Perkaus (eds), Options for protecting the climate. WRI, Washington D.C.
Blanchard, O, C. Criqui, A. Kitous, and L. Vinguier, 2003: Efficiency with equity: A pragmatic Approach. I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K. Le Goulven, R.U. Mendoza (eds), Providing public goods: managing globalization. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Office of Development Studies, United Nations Development Program, Grenoble, France.
Blok, K., G.J.M. Phylipsen, and J.W. Bode, 1997: The Triptych Approach, burden sharing differentiation of CO2 emissions reduction among EU Member States. Discussion paper for the informal workshop for the European Union Ad Hoc Group on Climate, Zeist, the Netherlands, January 16-17, 1997, Dept. of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 1997 (9740).
Bluffstone, R. and B.A. Larson (eds) 1997: Controlling Pollution in Transition economies: Theories and Methods. London, UK: Edward Elgar.
Blyth, W. and R. Baron, 2003: Green investment schemes: Options and issues. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2003)9, OECD/IEA, Paris.
Blyth, W. and M. Yang, 2006: Impact of climate change policy uncertainty on power investment. Document no. IEA/SLT(2006)11. IEA, Paris.
Bodansky, D., 2004: International climate efforts beyond 2012: A survey of approaches. Pew Climate Center, Washington D.C., <www.pewclimate.org>, accessed 03/07/07.
Bode, S., 2004: Equal emissions per capita over time - a proposal to combine responsibility and equity of rights for post-2012 GHG emission entitlement allocation. European Environment, 14, pp. 300-316.
Böhringer, C. and H. Welsch, 2004: Contraction and convergence of carbon emissions: an intertemporal multi-region CGE analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26, pp. 21-39.
Böhringer, C. and A. Löschel, 2005: Climate policy beyond Kyoto: Quo vadis? A computable general equlibrium analysis based on expert judgements. KYKLOS 58(4), pp. 467-493.
Böhringer, C. and H. Welsch, 2006: Burden Sharing in a greenhouse: egalitarianism and sovereignty reconciled. Applied Economics, 38, pp. 981-996.
Bollen, J.C., A.J.G. Manders, and P.J.J. Veenendaal, 2004: How much does a 30% emission reduction cost? Macroeconomic effects of post-Kyoto climate policy in 2020. CPB Document no 64, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.
Bosi, M. and J. Ellis, 2005: Exploring options for sectoral crediting mechanisms. OECD/IEA Annex 1 Expert Group, Paris.
Bouille, D., O. Girardin, 2002: Learning from the Argentine Voluntary Commitment. K.A. Baumert (ed), Options for Protecting the Climate. World Resource Institute, Washington D.C.
Bovenburg, A. and L. Goulder, 2001: Neutralizing the adverse industry impacts of CO2 abatement policies: What does it cost? Behavioral and distributional effects of environmental policy (eds, C. Carraro and G. Metcalf), University of Chicago Press.
Braathen, N.A., 2005: Environmental agreements in combination with other policy instruments. E. Croci, the Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements, Springer, 2005.
Bradford, D.F., 2004: Improving on Kyoto: Greenhouse gas control as the purchase of a global public good. Bradnee Chambers et al. (2005). Typology of Response Options, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Bradley, R., K. Baumert, N.K. Dubash, J.R. Moreira, S. Mwakasonda, W.-S. Ng, L.A. Horta Nogueira, V. Parente, J. Pershing, L. Schipper, and H. Winkler, 2005: Growing in the greenhouse: Policies and measures for sustainable development while protecting the climate. Washington, USA, World Resources Institute.
Braun, M. and Stute, E. 2004: Anbieter von Dienstleistungen fur den Ausgleich von Treibhaus-gasemissionen. Germanwatch-Hintergrundpapier, Bonn/Berlin, <www.germanwatch.org/rio/thg-ad03.htm> accessed 03/07/07.
Broekhoff, M., 2004: Institutional and cost implications of multi-project baselines. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, pp. 201-216, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Brouhle, K., C. Griffiths, and A. Wolverton, 2005: The use of voluntary approaches for environmental policymaking in the US. E. Croci, the Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements, Springer, 2005.
Bruvoll, A. and B.M. Larsen, 2004: Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: Do carbon taxes work? Energy Policy, 32. A previous version is available as Discussion Papers 337 by Statistics Norway, <www.ssb.no/cgi-bin/publsoek?job=forside&id=dp-337&kode=dp&lang=en>, accessed 03/07/07.
Bulkeley, H., 2001: No regrets? Economy and environment in Australia’s domestic climate change policy process. Global Environmental Change, 11, pp. 155-169.
Burns, W.C.G., 2004: Climate justice: The prospect for climate change litigation. The exigencies that drive potential causes of action for climate change damages at the international level. American Society of International Law Proceedings, 98, 223 pp.
Burtraw, D., A. Krupnick, K. Palmer, A. Paul, M. Toman, and C. Bloyd, 2001a: Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the United States from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. RFF Discussion Paper 01-61.
Burtraw, D., K. Palmer, A. Paul, R. Bharvirkar, 2001b: The effect of allowance allocation on the cost of carbon emissions trading. RFF Discussion Paper 01-30.
Burtraw, D., K. Palmer, R. Bharvirkar, and A. Paul, 2002: The effect on asset values of the allocation of carbon dioxide emission allowances. The Electricity Journal, June 2002, 15(5), pp. 51-62.
Bygrave, S., 2004: Experience with emissions trading and project-based mechanisms in OECD and non-OECD countries. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and Project-Based Mechanisms, Proceedings of OECD Global Forum on Sustainable Development: Emissions Trading, OECD, Paris.
Bygrave, S. and M. Bosi, 2004a: Linking non-EU domestic emisisons trading schemes with the EU emissions trading scheme. OECD/IEA Annex I Expert Group, Paris.
Bygrave, S. and M. Bosi, 2004b: Linking project-based mechanisms with domestic greenhouse gas emissions trading schemes. OECD/IEA Annex I Expert Group, Paris.
Cambridge Econometrics, 2005: Modelling the initial effects of the climate change levy. Report submitted to HM Customs and Excise by Cambridge Econometrics, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge and the Policy Studies Institute, <http://customs.hmrc.gov.uk/channelsPortalWebApp/channelsPortalWebApp.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=pageLibrary_MiscellaneousReports&propertyType=document&columns=1&id=HMCE_PROD1_023971>, accessed 03/07/07.
Carraro, C. and D. Siniscalco, 1993: Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics, 52, pp. 309-328.
Chander, P. and H. Tulkens, 1995: A core-theoretic solution for the design of cooperative agreements on transfrontier pollution. International Tax and Public Finance, 2, pp. 279-293.
Chan-Woo, K., 2002: Negotiations on Climate Change: Debates on commitment of developing countries and possible responses. East Asian Review, 14, pp. 42-60.
Charnovitz, S., 2003: Trade and climate: Potential conflicts and synergies. In Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort Against Climate Change, Aldy et al., Report prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2003.
Chen, W., 2003: Carbon quota price and CDM potential after Marrakesh. Energy Policy, 31, pp. 709-719.
Chidiak, M., 2002: Lessons from the French experience with voluntary agreements for greenhouse-gas reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, pp 121-128.
Christiansen, A.C. and J. Wettestad, 2003: The EU as a frontrunner on emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed? Climate Policy, 3, pp. 3-13.
Christiansen, A.C., A. Arvanitakis, K. Tangen, H. Hasselkippe, 2005: Price determinants in the EU emissions trading scheme. Climate Policy, 5, pp. 1-17.
Climate Justice Programme, 2005: Gas flaring in Nigeria: A human rights, environmental change. Natural Resources Journal, 38, pp. 563-569.
Cooper, R., 1998: Towards a real treaty on global warming. Foreign Affairs, 77, pp. 66-79.
Cooper, R., 2001: The Kyoto Protocol: A flawed concept. Environmental Law Reporter, 31(11), pp. 484-411, 492 pp.
Corfee-Morlot, J., M. Berg, and G. Caspary, 2002: Exploring linkages between natural resource management and climate adaptation strategies. OECD, Paris, COM/ENV/EPOC/DCD/DAC(2002)3/Final.
Corfee-Morlot, J., N. Höhne, 2003: Climate change: long-term targets and short-term commitments. Global Environmental Change, 13, 2003, pp. 277-293.
Cramton, P. and S. Kerr, 2002: Tradable carbon permit auctions: How and why to auction not grandfather. Energy Policy, 30, pp. 333-345.
Criqui, P., A. Kitous, M. Berk, M. Den Elzen, B. Eickhout, P. Lucas, D. van Vuuren, N. Kouvaritakis, and D. Vanregemorter, 2003: Greenhouse gas reduction pathways in the UNFCCC process up to 2025 - Technical Report. Study Contract: B4-3040/2001/325703/MAR/E.1 for the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.
Croci, E. (ed.), 2005: The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements: Design, implementation and evaluation issues. Springer, The Netherlands.
Dang, H., A. Michaelowa, and D. Tuan, 2003: Synergy of adaptation and mitigation strategies in the context of sustainable development: the case of Vietnam. Climate Policy, 3, Supplement 1, pp. S81-S96.
Darnall, N. and J. Carmin, 2003: The design and rigor of U.S. voluntary environmental programs: results from the survey. Raleigh, North Carolina State University.
Dasgupta, C. and U. Kelkar, 2003: Indian perspectives on beyond-2012. Presentation at the open symposium ‘International Climate Regime beyond 2012: Issues and Challenges’, Tokyo.
Davies, J.C. and J. Mazurek, 1998: Pollution control in the United States: Evaluating the system.
DEHSt, 2005: Implementation of the emissions trading in the EU: National allocation plans of all EU states. German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the Federal Environmental Agency (UBA), Berlin, November 2005.
Demailly, D. and P. Quirion, 2006: CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: Grandfathering vs. output-based allocation. Climate Policy.
Den Elzen, M.G.J. and M. Schaeffer, 2002: Responsibility for past and future global warming: uncertainties in attributing anthropogenic climate change. Climatic change, 54, pp. 29-73.
Den Elzen, M.G.J. and M.M. Berk, 2004: Bottom-up approaches for defining future climate mitigation commitments. MNP Report 728001029/2005, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Den Elzen, M.G.J. and M. Meinshausen, 2005: Meeting the EU 2°C climate target: global and regional emission implications. MNP Report 728001031/2005, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Den Elzen, M.G.J. and M. Meinshausen, 2006: Multi-gas emission pathways for meeting the EU 2°C climate target. Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, H.J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley, and G. Yohe (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Den Elzen, M.G.J. and P. Lucas, 2005: The FAIR model: a tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of climate regimes. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 10(2) pp. 115-134.
Den Elzen, M.G.J., F. Fuglestvedt, N. Höhne, C. Trudinger, J. Lowe, B. Matthews, B. Romstad, C. Pires de Campos, and N. Andronova, 2005a: Analysing countries’ contribution to climate change: Scientific and policy-related choices. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, pp. 614-636.
Den Elzen, M.G.J., M. Schaeffer, and P. Lucas, 2005b: Differentiation of future commitments based on Parties’ contribution to climate change. Climate Change: uncertainties in the ‘Brazilian Proposal’ in the context of a policy implementation. Climatic Change, 71(3), pp. 277-301.
Den Elzen, M.G.J., P. Lucas, and D.P. van Vuuren, 2005c: Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. Energy Policy, 33(16), pp. 2138-2151.
Den Elzen, M.G.J., M.M. Berk, P. Lucas, C. Criqui, and A. Kitous, 2006a: Multi-Stage: a rule-based evolution of future commitments under the Climate Change Convention. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 6(2006), pp. 1-28.
Den Elzen, M.G.J., P. Lucas, and D.P. van Vuuren, 2006b: Exploring regional abatement costs and options under allocation schemes for emission allowances. MNP report, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Depledge, J., 2000: Tracing the origins of the Kyoto Protocol: An article-by-article textual history. UNFCCC document FCCC/TP/2000/2, <www.unfccc.int>, accessed 16/04/2007.
Dinan, T. and D.L. Rogers, 2002: Distributional effects of carbon allowances trading: How government decisions determine winners and losers. National Tax Journal, 55(2).
Dlugolecki, A. and S. Lafeld, 2005: Climate change - agenda for action: the financial sector’s perspective. Allianz Group and WWF, Munich.
Doelle, M., 2004: Climate Change and the WTO: Opportunities to motivate state action on climate change through the world trade organization. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 13(1), pp. 85-103.
Dudek, D. and A. Golub, 2003: ‘Intensity’ targets: Pathway or roadblock to preventing climate change while enhancing economic growth? Climate Policy, 3(S2), pp. S21-28.
Dutschke, M., 2002: Fractions of permanence - Squaring the cycle of sink carbon accounting. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7(4), pp.381-402.
Edenhofer, O., K. Lessmann, C. Kemfert, M. Grubb, and J. Köhler, 2006: Induced technological change: Exploring its implication for the ecnomics of atmospheric stabilization. The Energy Journal Special Issue, 57, pp. 107.
Edmonds, J. and M. Wise, 1998: Building backstop technologies and policies to implement the framework convention on climate change. Washington, D.C., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Edmonds, J. and M.A. Wise, 1999: Exploring a technology strategy for stabilising atmospheric CO2. International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change, C. Carraro, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 19.
Ekboir, J.M., 2003: Research and technology policies in innovation systems: zero tillage in Brazil, Research Policy, 32, pp. 573-586.
Ellerman, A.D., P. Joskow, R. Schmalensee, J.P. Montero, and E. Bailey, 2000: Markets for clean air. The U.S. Acid Rain Program, Cambridge University Press.
Ellerman, A.D., 2002: Designing a tradeable permit system to control SO2 emissions in China: Principles and practice. The Energy Journal, 23(2), pp. 1-26.
Ellerman, A.D. and I. Sue Wing, 2003: Absolute v. intensity-based emission caps. Climate Policy 3(Supplement 2), pp. S7-S20.
Ellerman, A.D., 2005: U.S. experience with emissions trading: Lessons for CO2. Climate Policy and Emissions Trading After Kyoto, edited by Bernd Hansjurgen. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
Ellerman, A.D., 2006: Are cap-and-trade programs more environmentally effective than conventional regulation? In Moving to Markets: Lessons from Thirty Years of Experience, J. Freeman and C. Kolstad (eds), Oxford University Press, New York.
Ellis, J. and R. Baron, 2005: Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms: An initial assessment of electricity and aluminium. OECD/IEA Annex I Group, Paris.
Ellis, J. and K. Karousakis, 2006: The developing CDM market: May 2006 Update. OECD/IEA Annex I Expert Group, Paris.
Ellis, J., 2006: Issues related to a programme of activities under the CDM. OECD/IEA Annex I Group, Paris.
Ellis, J., H. Winkler, J. Corfee-Morlot, and F. Gagnon-Lebrun, 2007: CDM: Taking stock, Looking forward. Energy Policy, 35, pp.15-28.
Esty, D.C. and M.E. Porter, 1998: Industrial ecology and competitiveness, Strategic implications for the firm. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), pp. 35-43.
Esty, D.C., 2001: Bridging the trade-environment divide. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), Summer 2001, pp. 113-130.
Esty, D. and M. Ivanova (eds), 2002: Global environmental governance: Options and opportunities. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven.
Eyckmans, J. and M. Finus, 2003: Coalition formation in global warming game: How the design of protocols affects the success of environmental treaty-making. Pre-publication draft.
Fernandez, M. and A. Michaelowa, 2003: Joint implementation and EU accession countries. Global Environmental Change, 13, pp. 269-275.
Fichtner, W., M. Goebelt, and O. Rentz, 2001: The efficiency of international cooperation in mitigating climate change: analysis of joint implementation, the clean development mechanism and emission trading for the Federal Republic of Germany, the Russian Federation and Indonesia. Energy Policy, 29, pp. 817-830.
Figures, C., 2004: Institutional capacity to integrate institutional development and climate change consideration: An assessment of DNAs in LAC. Interamerican Development Bank, October 2004, Washington, D.C.
Finus, M., 2002: New developments in coalition theory: An application to the case of global pollution. The International Dimension of Environmental Policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Holland.
Fischer, C., 2001: Rebating environmental policy revenues: Output-based allocations and tradable performance standards. RFF Discussion Paper, 01-22.
Fischer, C., S. Hoffman, and Y. Yoshino, 2002: Multilateral trade agreements and market-based environmental policies. RFF Discussion Paper, May.
Fischer, C., 2006: Project-based mechanisms for emissions reductions: balancing trade-offs with baselines. Energy Policy.
Fisher, C., I.W.H. Parry, and W.A. Pizer, 2003: Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, pp.523-545.
Fisher, C. and R. Newell, 2004: Environmental and technology policies for climate change and renewable energy, resources for the future. Discussion paper 04-05, April 2004.
Fleming, P.D. and P.H. Webber, 2004: Local and regional greenhouse gas management. Energy Policy, 32(2004), pp. 761-771.
Fowler, R., 2004: Lessons from the implementation of a mandatory project-based greenhouse gas abatement scheme in the state of New South Wales, Australia. Greenhouse Gas Market 2004: Ready for Takeoff, International Emissions Trading Association, 2004.
Foxon, T. and R. Kemp, 2004: Innovation impacts of environmental policies. International Handbook on Environment and Technology Management (ETM).
Frankel, J.A., 1999: Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Policy Brief, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., 52.
Frankel, J.A. and A.K. Rose, 2003: Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Freeman, J. and C. Kolstad (eds), 2006: Moving to markets: Lessons from thirty years of experience. (Oxford University Press, New York.
Fritsche, M. and R. Lukas, 2001: Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30, pp. 297-312.
Gallagher, K.P., 2004: Free Trade and the Environment. Mexico, NAFTA and Beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gangopadhyay, S., B. Ramaswami, and W. Wadhwa, 2005: Reducing subsidies on household fuels in India: How will it affect the poor? Energy Policy, 33(2005), pp. 2326-2336.
GCI, 2005: GCI Briefing: Contraction & Convergence. <http://www.gci.org.uk/briefings/ICE.pdf>, accessed April 2006.
Geres, R. and A. Michaelowa, 2002: A qualitative method to consider leakage effects from CDM and JI projects. Energy Policy, 30(2002), pp. 461-463.
Germain, M., P.L. Toint, and H. Tulkens, 1998: Financial transfers to sustain cooperative international optimality in stock pollutant abatement. Sustainability and Firms: Technological Change and the Changing Regulatory Environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 205-219.
Germain, M., P.L. Toint, H. Tulkens, and A.d. Zeeuw, 2003: Transfers to sustain core theoretic cooperation in international stock pollutant control. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 28, pp. 79-99.
Gillespie, A., 2004: Small Island States in the face of Climate Change: The end of the line in international environmental responsibility. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 22, 107 pp.
Goldberg, D. and K. Baumert, 2004: Action targets: A new form of GHG commitment. Joint Implementation Quarterly, 10(3), pp. 8-9.
Golub, A. and E. Strukova, 2004: Russia and the GHG market. Climatic Change, 63, pp.223-243.
Goulder, L., I. Parry, R. Williams, and D. Burtraw, 1999: The cost effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental effectiveness in a second best setting. Journal of Public Economics, 72(3), pp. 329- 360.
Goulder, L.H. and S.H. Schneider, 1999: Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 emissions abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics, 21, pp. 211-253.
Grafton, Q., F. Jotzo, and M. Wasson, 2004: Financing sustainable development: country undertakings and rights for environmental sustainability (CURES). Ecological Economics, 51, pp. 65-78.
Greene, O., 1996: Lessons from other international environmental agreements. In Sharing the effort - Options for differentiating commitments on climate change, M. Paterson and M. Grubb (eds) The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, pp. 23-44.
Greiner, S. and A. Michaelowa, 2003: Defining investment additionality for CDM projects - practical approaches. Energy Policy, 31(2003), pp. 1007-1015.
Groenenberg, H., K. Blok, and J. van der Sluijs, 2004: Global Triptych: a bottom-up approach for the differentiation of commitments under the Climate Convention. Climate Policy, 4(4), pp. 153-175.
Grossman, D.A., 2003: Warming up to a not-so-radical idea: Tort based climate change litigation. Colombia Journal of Environmental Law, 28, pp. 1-61.
Grubb, M., C. Hope, and R. Fouquet, 2002: Climatic implications of the Kyoto Protocol: The contribution of international spillover. Climatic Change, 54, pp. 11-28.
Grubb, M., 2004: Technology innovation and climate change policy: an overview of issues and options. Keio Economic Studies, 41(2), pp.103-132.
Grubb, M., C. Azar, and U.M. Persson, 2005: Allowance allocation in the European emissions trading scheme: a commentary. Climate Policy, 5, pp. 127-136.
Gupta, J., 1998: Encouraging developing country participation in the climate change regime. Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gupta, J. and M. Grubb (eds), 2000: Climate Change and European leadership: A sustainable role for Europe. Environment and Policy Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 344 pp.
Gupta, J. and L. Ringius, 2001: The EU’s climate leadership: Between ambition and reality. International Environmental Agreements. Politics, law and economics, 1(2), pp. 281-299, London, 178 pp.
Gupta, J., 2003a: Engaging developing countries in climate change: (KISS and Make-up!). Climate Policy for the 21st Century, Meeting the Long-Term Challenge of Global Warming, D. Michel (ed.), Washington D.C., Center for Transatlantic Relations, <http://transatlantic.sais-jhu.edu>, accessed 03/07/07.
Gupta, S., 2003b: Incentive-based approaches for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions: Issues and prospects for India. India and Global Climate Change Perspectives on Economics and Policy from a Developing Country, M.A. Toman, U. Chakravorty, and S. Gupta (eds), Washington, Resources for the Future Press.
Gupta, S. and P.M. Bhandari, 1999: An effective allocation criterion for CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 27(12), November.
Gupta, S. and P.M. Bhandari, 2003: Allocation of GHG emissions - An example of short term and long term criteria. India and Global Climate Change, Perspectives on Economics and Policy from a Developing Country, Resources for the Future, M.A. Toman, U. Chakravorty, S. Gupta (eds).
Hahn, R., 1998: The economic and politics of Climate Change. Washington D.C., American Enterprise Institute Press.
Hahn, R.W., 2001: A primer on environmental policy design. London, Routledge.
Haites, E., 2003a: Harmonization between national and International Tradeable Permit Schemes. CATEP Synthesis Paper, OECD, Paris.
Haites, E., 2003b: Output-based allocation as a form of protection for internationally competitive industries. Climate Policy, 3(Supplement 2), December 2003, pp. S29-S41.
Hall, B.H., 2002: The financing of research and development NBER Working Papers 8773. International Bureau of Economic Research.
Hamilton, K., 2005: The finance-policy gap: Policy conditions for attracting long-term investment. The Finance of Climate Change, K. Tang (ed.), Risk Books, London.
Hancock, E.E., 2005: Red dawn, blue thunder, purple rain: Corporate risk of liability for global climate change and the sec disclosure dilemma. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 17, 223 pp.
Hanks, J., 2002: Voluntary agreements, climate change and industrial energy efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, pp. 103-107.
Hargrave, T., N. Helme, and C. Vanderlan, 1998: Growth baselines. Washington, D.C., USA, Center for Clean Air Policy.
Harrington, W., R.D. Morgenstern, and P. Nelson, 2000: On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2), pp.297-322.
Harrington, W., R.D. Morgenstern, and T. Sterner, 2004: Overview: Comparing instrument choices. Choosing Environmental Policy, W. Harrington, R.D. Morgenstern, and T. Sterner (eds), Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future Press.
Harrison, K., 1999: Talking with the donkey: Cooperative approaches to environmental protection. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(3), pp. 51-72.
Harrison, D. and D. Radov, 2002: Evaluation of alternative initial allocation mechanisms in a European Union greenhouse gas emissions allowance trading scheme. National Economic Research Associates, prepared for DG Environment, European Commission.
Heemst, J. van, and V. Bayangos, 2004: Poverty and Climate Change. Beyond Climate: Options for Broadening Climate Policy, M.T.J. Kok and H.C. de Coninck (ed.), RIVM Report 500036 001, Bilthoven, pp. 21-51.
Helby, P., 2002: EKO-Energi - a public voluntary programme: targeted at Swedish firms with ambitious environmental goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, pp 143-151.
Helm, C. and U.E. Simonis, 2001: Distributive justice in international environmental policy: Axiomatic foundation and exemplary formulation. Environmental Values, 10, pp. 5-18.
Hepburn, C., M. Grubb, K. Heuhoff, F. Matthes, and M. Tse, 2006: Auctioning of EU ETS Phase II allowances: how and why? Climate Policy.
Hershkowitz, A., 1998: In defense of recycling. Social research, 65(1), Spring.
Herzog, H., K. Caldeira, and J. Reilly, 2003: An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage. Climatic Change, 59, pp. 293-310.
Higley, C.J., F. Convery, and F. Leveque, 2001: Voluntary approaches: An introduction. Environmental Voluntary Approaches: Research Insights for Policy Makers, C.J. Higley and F. Leveque (eds), CERNA, 2001.
Hoel, M. and K. Schneider, 1997: Incentives to participate in an international environmental agreement. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9, pp. 153-170.
Hoffman, A., 2005: Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3).
Höhne, N., J. Harnisch, G.J.M. Phylipsen, K. Blok, and C. Galleguillos, 2003: Evolution of commitments under the UNFCCC: Involving newly industrialized economies and developing countries. Research Report 201 41 255. UBA-FB 000412, <http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-medien-e/index.htm >, accessed 03/07/07.
Höhne, N. and K. Blok, 2005: Calculating historical contributions to climate change - discussing the ‘Brazilian Proposal’. Climatic Change, 71, pp. 141-173.
Höhne, N., D. Phylipsen, S. Ullrich, and K. Blok, 2005: Options for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. For the German Federal Environmental Agency, 02/05, ISSN 1611-8855, <http://www.fiacc.net/data/Climate_Change_02.05.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
Höhne, N. and K. Blok, 2006: The impact of the Kyoto Protocol on climate stabilization. What is next after the Kyoto Protocol? Assessment of options for international climate policy post 2012. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Techne Press.
Höhne, N., 2006: What is next after the Kyoto Protocol. Assessment of options for international climate policy post 2012. Techne Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, ISBN 908594005-2.
Höhne, N., M.G.J. den Elzen, and M. Weiss, 2006: Common but differentiated convergence (CDC), a new conceptual approach to long-term climate policy. Climate Policy (accepted).
Hovi, J. and I. Areklett, 2004: Enforcing the climate regime: Game theory and the Marrakesh Accords. In International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 4, pp. 1-26.
Humphreys, J., M. van Bueren, and A. Stoeckel, 2003: Greening farm subsidies, rural industries research and development corporation, Barton ACT ISBN 064258608.
Huq, S. and I. Burton, 2003: Funding adaptation to climate change: What, who and how to fund? Sustainable Development opinion paper, IIED, London.
Huq, S. and H. Reid, 2004: Mainstreaming adaptation in development. IDS Bulletin. 35, pp. 15-21.
IAI, 2002: Aluminium: Industry as a partner for sustainable development. International Aluminium Institute, Paris: ICCA and UNEP, <http://www.uneptie.org/outreach/wssd/docs/sectors/final/aluminium.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
IEA, 2001: Energy subsidy reform and sustainable development challenges for policymakers. International Energy Agency, Paris.
IEA, 2003: World Energy Investment Outlook. International Energy Agency, Paris.
IEA, 2004: Renewable Energy: Market and Policy Trends in IEA countries. International Energy Agency, Paris.
IEA, 2005: Renewables Information. International Energy Agency, Paris.
IEA, 2006: Energy Statistics of Non-OECD Countries. International Energy Agency, Paris.
Illum, K. and N. Meyer, 2004: Joint implementation: methodology and policy considerations. Energy Policy, 32, pp. 1013-1023.
IPA Energy Consulting (IPA), 2005: Implications of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for the U.K. power Generation Sector. Report to the Department of Trade and Industry, November 11, 2005.
IPCC, 1996: Climate Change 1995 - Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. J.P. Bruce, H. Lee, E.F. Haites [eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 448 pp.
IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart, J. Pan [eds.]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 752 pp.
IPCC, 2007a: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B.M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.
IPCC, 2007b: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Parry, M.L., O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
Ivanova, A. and M. Angeles, 2005: Trade and environmental issues in APEC. Globalization: Opportunities and Challenges for East Asia, K. Fatemi, (ed), The Haworth Press, Binhampton, N.Y.
Jaccard, M., N. Rivers, C. Bataille, R. Murphy, J. Nyboer, and B. Sadownik, 2006: Burning our money. C.D. Howe Institute, ISSN 0824-8001, 204, May 2006.
Jacobs, R.W., 2005: Treading deep waters: Substantive law issues in Tuvalu’s threat to sue the United States in the international court of justice. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 14, 103 pp.
Jacoby, H.D., R. Prinn, and R. Schmalensee, 1998: Kyoto’s Unfinished Business. Foreign Affairs.
Jacoby, H.D. and A.D. Ellerman, 2004: The safety valve and climate policy. Energy Policy, 32(4), pp. 481-491.
Jaeger, C.C., 2003: Climate Change: Combining mitigation and adaptation. Climate Policy for the 21st Century: Meeting the Long-Term Challenge of Global Warming. D. Michel,Washington, D.C., Center for Transatlantic Relations.
Jaffe, A.B., R.G. Newell, and R.N. Stavins, 2003: Technological change and the environment. In Handbook of Environmental Economics. K.-G. Mäler and J. Vincent (eds), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier Science, 2003.
Johannsen, K.S., 2002: Combining voluntary agreements and taxes: an evaluation of the Danish agreement scheme on energy efficiency in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, pp 129-141.
Johnstone, N., 2002: The use of tradable permits in combination with other policy instruments: A scoping paper. ENV/EPOC/WPNEP(2002)28, Working Party on National Environmental Policy, OECD, Paris.
Jordaan, J., 2004: Competition, geographical concentration and FDI- induced externalities: New evidence for Mexican manufacturing industries. Working Paper 32, Technological Institute of Monterrey, Mexico.
Jotzo, F. and A. Michaelowa, 2002: Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech Accords. Climate Policy, 2, pp. 179-196.
Jotzo, F. and J.C.V. Pezzey, 2005: Optimal intensity targets for emissions trading under uncertainty. Draft. Canberra, AU: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies - Australian National University.
Justice, D. and C. Philibert, 2005: International energy technology collaboration and climate change mitigation. Synthesis Report, OECD/IEA Annex I Expert Group on the UNFCCC, Paris.
Kågeström, J., K. Astrand, and P. Helby, 2000: Voluntary Agreements-Implementation and Efficiency: Swedish Country Report,
Kameyama, Y., 2003: Dual track approach: an optional climate architecture for beyond 2012? COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)6 30. Tsukuba, JP, National Institute for Environmental Studies.
Kameyama, Y., 2004: The future climate regime: a regional comparison of proposals. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 4, pp. 307-326.
Kanie, N., 2003: Leadership and domestic policy in multilateral diplomacy: The case of the Netherlands. International Negotiation, 8(2), pp. 339-365.
Kartha, S., M. Lazarus, and M. Bosi, 2002: Practical baseline recommendations for greenhouse gas projects in the electric power sector. OECD, Paris.
Kartha, S., M. Lazarus, and M. Bosi, 2004: Baseline recommendations for greenhouse gas mitigation projects in the electric power sector. Energy Policy, 32, pp.545-566.
Kemfert, C., W. Liseb, and R.S.J. Tol, 2004: Games of Climate Change with international trade. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands, Environmental and Resource Economics, 28, pp. 209-232
Kennedy, P.W., B. Laplante, and J. Maxwell, 1994: Pollution policy: The role for publicly provided information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, pp. 31-43.
Keohane, N., R.L. Revesz, and R.N. Stavins, 1998: The choice of regulatory instruments in environmental policy. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22, pp.313-367.
Khanna, M. and L.A. Damon, 1999: EPA’s voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(1), pp. 1-25.
Kim, Y. and K. Baumert, 2002: Reducing uncertainty through dual intensity targets. K. Baumert (ed.), Building on the Kyoto Protocol, Options for protecting the climate, World resources Institute, Washington, USA, <http://pubs.wri.org/pubs_pdf.cfm?PubID=3762>, accessed 03/07/07.
King, A. and M. Lenox, 2000: Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4),pp. 698-716.
King, M.D., P. Sarria, D.J. Moss, and N.J. Numark, 2004: U.S. business actions to address climate change: case studies of five industry sectors. Sustainable Energy Institute, November, 2004.
Klepper, G. and S. Peterson, 2004: The EU emissions trading scheme - allowance prices, trade flows and competitiveness effects. European Environment, 14, pp.201-218.
Koch, T. and A. Michaelowa, 1999: ‘Hot air’ reduction through non-quantifiable measures and early JI. Joint Implementation Quarterly, 5(2), pp. 9-10.
Kolk, A. and J. Pinske, 2004: Market strategies for Climate Change. European Management Journal, 22(3), pp.304-314.
Kolk, A. and J. Pinske, 2005: Business responses to Climate Change: Identifying emergent strategies. California Management Review, Spring, 2005.
Kolstad, C., 2000: Environmental Economics. Oxford University Press, New York.
Kolstad, C.D. 2006: The simple analytics of greenhouse gas emission intensity reduction targets. Energy Policy, 33(17), pp. 2231-2236.
Konar, S. and M.A. Cohen, 1997: Information as regulation: The effect of community right-to-know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, pp.109-124.
Korppoo, A., 2005: Russian energy efficiency projects: lessons learnt from activities implemented jointly. Pilot phase. Energy Policy, 33, pp. 113-126.
Kousky, C. and S. Schneider, 2003: Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? 3(4), December 2003, pp. 359-372.
Krarup, S. and S. Ramesohl, 2002: Voluntary agreements: key to higher energy efficiency in industry? Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Process, Practice and Future Use, P. ten Brink (ed.), Sheffield, UK.
Kruger, J., B. McLean, and R. Chen, 2000: A tale of two revolutions: Administration of the SO2 trading program. Emissions Trading: Environment al Policy’s New Approach, R. Kosobud (ed.), New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Kruger, J., K. Grover, and J. Schreifels, 2003: Building institutions to address air pollution in developing countries: The Cap-and-trade approach. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and Project-Based Mechanisms, Proceedings of OECD Global Forum on Sustainable Development: Emissions Trading, OECD, Paris.
Kruger, J., 2006: From SO2 to greenhouse gases: Trends and events shaping future emissions trading programs in the United States. In Acid in the Environment: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects, G.R. Visgilio and D.M. Whitelaw (ed.), Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006.
Kuik, O., 2003: Climate change policies, energy security and carbon dependency. Trade-offs for the European Union in the Longer Term. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 3, pp.221-242.
Kuik, O., and M. Mulder, 2004: Emissions trading and competitiveness: pros and cons of relative and absolute schemes. Energy Policy, 32, pp. 737-745.
La Rovere, E.L., S.K. Ribeiro, and K.A. Baumert, 2002: The Brazilian proposal on relative responsibility for global warming. Options for protecting the climate. K.A. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, and J. F. Perkaus. Washington, World Resource Institute (WRI).
Lecoq, F. and R. Crassous, 2003: International climate regime beyond 2012 - Are quota allocation rules robust to uncertainty? Policy Research Working Paper. Washington D.C.
Lecoq, F. and K. Capoor, 2005: State and trends of the carbon market 2005. World Bank, Washington D.C.
Levy, D.L. and P.J. Newell, 2005. The business of global environmental governance (Global Environmental Accord: Strategies for sustainability and institutional innovation). Cambridge, MIT Press.
Lipanovich, A., 2005: Smoke before oil: Modeling a suit against the auto and oil industry on the tobacco tort litigation is feasible. Golden Gate University Law Review, 35, 429 pp.
Lisowski, M., 2002: The emperor’s new clothes: redressing the Kyoto Protocol. Climate Policy 2(2-3).
Lutter, R., 2000: Developing countries’ greenhouse emissions: Uncertainty and implications for participation in the kyoto protocol. The Energy Journal, 21(4).
Lyon, T. P. and J.W. Maxwell, 2000: Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: A survey. Economic Institutions and Environmental Policy, M. Franzini and A. Nicita (eds), Chapter 7, pp. 142-174.
Lyon, T.P. and J.W. Maxwell, 2004: Corporate environmentalism and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
MacGill, I., H. Outhred, and K. Nolles, 2006: Some design lessons from market-based greenhouse gas regulation in the restructured Australian electricity industry. Energy Policy, 34, pp.11-25.
Maeda, A., 2003: The emergence of market power in emission rights markets: The role of initial permit distribution. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 24(3), pp. 293-314.
Mank, B.C., 2005: Standing and global warming: Is injury to all, injury to none? Environmental Law, 35, pp.1-83.
Manne, A.S. and R.G. Richels, 1999: The Kyoto Protocol: A cost-effective strategy for meeting environmental objectives? Energy Journal, Kyoto Special Issue, pp. 1-25.
Marburg, K.L., 2001: Combating the impacts of global warming: A novel legal strategy. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 171 pp.
Margolick, M. and D. Russell, 2001: Corporate greenhouse gas reduction targets. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington, D.C.
Margolis, R.M. and D.M. Kammen, 1999: Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of federal policy. Energy Policy, 27, pp. 575-584.
Markussen, P. and G.T. Svendsen, 2005: Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy, 33, pp. 245-255.
Matthes, F. et al., 2005: The environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (Öko Institut).
Maurer, C. and R. Bhandari, 2000: The climate of export credit agencies. World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.
Maxwell, J.W., T.P. Lyon, and S.C. Hackett, 2000: Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics, XLIII, October, pp. 583-618.
McKibbin, W. and P. Wilcoxen, 1997: Salvaging the Kyoto climate negotiations. Policy Brief, Brookings Institution, 27.
McKibbin, W.J. and P.J. Wilcoxen, 2002: Climate change policy after Kyoto: A blueprint for a realistic approach. Washington D.C., Brookings Institution.
McKinstry, R., 2004: Laboratories for local solutions for global problems: State, local, and private leadership in developing strategies to mitigate the causes and effects of climate change. Penn State Environmental Law Review, 12(1), pp. 15-82.
Meira Filho, L.G. and J.D. Gonzales Miguez, 2000: Note on the time-dependant relationship between emissions of greenhouse gases and climate change. Technical note, Ministry of Science and Technology Federal Republic of Brazil, <http://www.mct.gov.br/clima>, accessed 03/07/07.
Menanteau, P., D. Finon, and M-L. Lamy, 2003: Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 31(8), pp.799-812.
Meyer, N.I., 2004: Development of Danish wind power market. Energy &Environment, 15(4), pp.657-672.
Michaelowa, A., 2002: The AIJ pilot phase as laboratory for CDM and JI. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 2(3-4), pp. 267-280.
Michaelowa, A., 2003a: CDM host country institution building. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 8, pp.201-220.
Michaelowa, A., 2003b: Germany - a pioneer on earthen feet? Climate Policy, 3(1), pp. 31-44.
Michaelowa, A., 2004: International review for Environmental Strategies, 5, 217-231.
Michaelowa, A. and F. Jotzo, 2005: Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy, 33, pp. 511-523.
Michaelowa, A., K. Tangen, and H. Hasselknippe, 2005a: Issues and options for the post-2012 climate architecture -- An overview. International Environmental Agreements, 5, pp. 5-24.
Michaelowa, A., S. Butzengeiger, and M. Jung, 2005b: Graduation and deepening: An ambitious post-2012 climate policy scenario. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 5, pp. 25-46.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005: Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Mitchell, R.B., 2005: Flexibility, compliance and norm development in the climate regime. Implementing Climate Regime: International Compliance, O.S. Stokke, J. Hovi, and G. Ulfstein, Earthscan, London, pp. 65-83.
Moe, A., K. Tangen, V. Berdin, and O. Pluzhnikov, 2003: emissions trading and green investments in Russia. Energy & Environment, 14(6), pp. 841-858.
Montero, J-P., J.M. Sanchez, and R. Katz, 2002: A market-based environmental policy experiment in Chile. Journal of Law and Economics, XLV, pp. 267-287 (April 2002).
Montero, J-P., 2005: Pollution markets with imperfectly observed emissions. RAND Journal of Economics, Autumn 2005, 36(3), pp. 645-660.
Montero. J-P., 2007: Tradeable Permits with incomplete monitoring: Evidence from Santiago’s Particulate Permits Program. Ch 6 in Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation, J. Freeman and C.D. Kolstad (eds), New York, Oxford University Press.
Morthorst, P.E., 2001: Interactions of a tradable green certificate market with a tradable permits market. Energy Policy, 29(5), pp. 345-353.
Müller, B., 1999: Justice in global warming negotiations - How to achieve a procedurally fair compromise. Oxford, Osford Institute for Energy Studies.
Müller, B., M. Michealowa, and C. Vrolijk, 2001: Rejecting Kyoto: A study of proposed alternatives to the Kyoto Protocol. Oxford, Climate Strategies International Network for Climate Policy Analysis, Oxford Institute for Energy Analysis.
Müller, B., 2002: Equity in global climate change: the great divide. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
Müller, B. and G. Müller-Fürstenberger, 2003: Price-related sensitivities of greenhouse gas intensity targets. Mimeo, Oxford Energy Institute.
Murase, S., 2002a: Implementation of international environmental law: Its international and domestic aspects: Case of the Kyoto Protocol. Jurisuto,1232, pp.71-78 (in Japanese).
Murase, S., 2002b: Conflict of international regimes: Trade and the environment, Institute of International Public Law and International Relations of Thessaloniki. Thesaurus Acroasium, XXXI, pp. 297-340.
Murase, S., 2003: Problem on compliance of the Kyoto Protocol and building a new international regime: Possibility of an alternative regime that includes the United States and major developing countries. Keio University, Mita Gakkai Zasshi, 96(2), pp. 5-18 (in Japanese).
Murase, S., 2004: Japan’s measures on global warming and the TBT agreement. Survey and Research on Coordination of Trade and Environment. GISPRI, 2004 (in Japanese), pp. 81-92.
Murase, S., 2005: Trade and the environment: With particular reference to climate change issues. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 2(2), pp. 18-38.
Najam, A., S. Huq, and Y. Sokona, 2003: Climate negotiations beyond Kyoto: developing countries concerns and interests. Climate Policy, 3, pp. 221-231.
Nakicenovic, N. and K. Riahi, 2003. Model runs with MESSAGE in the context of the further development of the kyoto-protocol. Technical report, Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen, Berlin.
Nash, J. and J. Ehrenfeld, 1996: Code Green: Business adopts voluntary environmental standards. Environment, 38(1), pp. 16-20, 36-45.
National Commission on Energy Policy (NCEP), 2004: Ending the energy stalemate: A bipartisan strategy to address America’s energy challenges. Washington, D.C.
National Research Council (NRC), 2003: Planning climate and global change research: A review of the draft U.S. Climate Change Science Program Strategic Plan. Washington, D.C.
Nelson, K. and B. de Jong, 2003: Making global initiatives local realities: carbon mitigation projects in Chiapas, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 13, pp.19-30.
Nemet, G.F., 2005: Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics. Energy Policy, August 2005.
Nemet, G.F. and D.M. Kammen, 2006: U.S. energy research and development: Declining investment, increasing need, and feasibility of expansion. Energy Policy, February 2006.
Nentjes, A., and G. Klaassen, 2004: On the quality of compliance mechanisms in the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy, 32, pp. 531-544.
NERA, 2005: Interactions of the EU ETS with Green and White Certificate Schemes: Summary Report for Policy Makers. <http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/pdf/ec_green_summary_report051117.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
Neuhoff, K., K. Keats, and M. Sata, 2006: Allocation and incentives: Impacts of CO2 emission allowance allocations to the electricity sector. Climate Policy (forthcoming).
Newell, P., 2000: Climate for change. Non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 222,
Newell, R. and W.A. Pizer, 2003: Regulating stock externalities under uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, pp. 416-432.
Newell, R. and W. Pizer, 2004: Uncertain discount rates in climate policy analysis. Energy Policy, 32, pp. 519-529.
Newell, R. and N. Wilson, 2005: Technology prizes for Climate Change Mitigation, Resources for the future. Discussion paper 05-33, June, 2005, Washington, D.C.
Ninomiya, Y., 2003: Prospects for energy efficiency improvement through an international agreement. Climate Regime Beyond 2012: Incentives for Global Participation, National Institute for Environmental Studies and the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
Nordhaus, W., 1998: Is the Kyoto Protocol a dead duck? Are there any live ducks around? Comparison of Alternative Global Tradable Emissions Regimes.
Nordhaus, W., 2001: After Kyoto: Alternative mechanisms to control global warming. Paper prepared for a joint session of the American Economic Association and Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
Nordic Council of Ministers, 2002: The use of economic instruments in Nordic Environmental Policy 1999-2001. TemaNord 2002:581, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.
Northrop, M., 2004: Leading by example: Profitable corporate strategies and successful public policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Widener Law Journal, 14(1), pp. 21-80.
Oates, W.E., 2001: A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism, Resources for the Future. Discussion Paper 01-54, November, 2001.
OECD, 1999: Conference on foreign direct investment & environment, The Hague, 28-29 January 1999, BIAC Discussion Paper.
OECD, 2001: Environmental indicators for Agriculture: methods and Results. Volume 3, Paris.
OECD, 2002: Agricultural practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Overview and results of survey instruments. Paris.
OECD, 2003(b): Choosing environmental policy instruments in the real world. Global forum on Sustainable Development: Emission Trading, 17-18 March, 2003, Paris.
OECD, 2003(c): Policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in industry - successful approaches and lessons learned. Workshop Report, Paris.
OECD, 2003(d): Technology innovation, development and diffusion. OECD and IEA Information Paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2003)4, Paris.
OECD, 2003(e): Voluntary approaches for environmental policy: Effectiveness, efficiency and usage in policy mixes. Paris.
OECD, 2005(a): Main science and technology indicators. 2005/2, Paris.
OECD, 2005(b): An empirical study of environmental R&D: What encourages facilities to be environmentally innovative. Paris.
OECD, 2005(c): The United Kingdom Climate Change Levy - A study in political economy. Paris.
OECD, 2005(d): Mobilising private investment for development: Policy lessons on the role of ODA. The DAC Journal, 6(2) - ISSN: 15633152, Paris.
Osgood, D.E., 2002: Environmental improvement with economic development through public information provision. Cambridge University Press, Environment and Development Economics, 7, pp. 751-768
Ott, H.E., H. Winkler, B. Brouns, S. Kartha, M. Mace, S. Huq, Y. Kameyama, A.P. Sari, J. Pan, Y. Sokona, P.M. Bhandari, A. Kassenberg, E.L. La Rovere, and A. Rahman, 2004: South-North dialogue on equity in the greenhouse. A proposal for an adequate and equitable global climate agreement. GTZ, Eschborn, Germany.
Pacala, S. and R. Socolow, 2004: Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305(5686), pp. 968-972.
Palmer, K., W.E. Oates, and P.R. Portney, 1995: Tightening environmental wtandards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), pp. 119-132.
Pan, J., 2005: Meeting human development goals with low emissions: An alternative to emissions caps for post-Kyoto from a developing country perspective. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5, pp. 89-104.
Parry, I., 2004: Are emissions permits regressive? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47, pp. 364-387.
Parry, J., A. Hammill, and J. Drexhage, 2005: Climate change and adaptation: A summary. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Winnipeg, <http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2005/climate_adaptation_sum.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
Peck, S.C. and T.J. Teisberg, 2003: An innovative policy approach to solve the global climate issue.
Penalver, E.M., 1998: Acts of God or toxic torts? Applying tort principles to the problem of climate change. Natural Resources Journal, 38, pp. 563-569.
Pershing, J. and F. Tudela, 2003: A long-term target: Framing the climate effort. Beyond Kyoto: advancing the international effort against climate change. Pew Climate Center, Washington D.C.
Persson, M. and C. Azar, 2004: Brazil beyond Kyoto - Prospects and problems in handling tropical deforestation in a second commitment period.
Persson, T.A., C. Azar, and K. Lindgren, 2006: Allocation of CO2 emission permits - economic incentives for emission reductions in developing countries. Energy Policy.
Peterson, T.D., 2004: The evolution of state climate change policy in the United States: Lessons learned and new directions. Widener Law Journal, 14(1), pp. 81-120.
Petrtakis, E., E.S. Sartzetakis, and A. Xepapadeas, 2005: Environmental information provision as a public policy instrument. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 4(1), Article 14. <http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol4/iss1/art14>, accessed 03/07/07.
Pew Center Report, 2004: Learning from State Action on Climate Change. In Brief, 8.
Pew Center Report, 2005: International climate efforts beyond 2012: Report of the climate dialogue at Pocantico. Arlington, VA, USA, Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
Pezzey, J.C.V. and M.A. Toman, 2002: The economics of sustainability: A review of journal articles. Discussion Paper 02-03, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Pezzey, J.C.V., 2003: Emission taxes and tradable permits: A comparison of views on long run efficiency. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(2), pp. 329-342.
Philibert, C., 2000: How could emissions trading benefit developing countries. Energy Policy, 28(13), pp. 947-956.
Philibert, C. and J. Pershing, 2001: Considering the options: climate targets for all countries. Climate Policy, 1(2), pp. 211-227.
Philibert, C., 2004: International energy technology collaboration and climate change mitigation. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2004)1, OECD/IEA, Paris.
Philibert, C., 2005a: Climate mitigation: Integrating approaches for future international co-operation. OECD/IEA Annex I Expert Group, Paris.
Philibert, C., 2005b: New commitment options: Compatibility with emissions trading. No. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)9. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency, <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/40/35798709.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
Phillips, G., 2004: GHG assessors - A new career option? Greenhouse Gas Market 2004: Ready for Takeoff, International Emissions Trading Association, 2004.
Pinguelli, R., S. Luiz, and S. Kahn Ribeiro, 2001: The present, past, and future contributions to global warming of CO2 emissions from fuels. Climatic Change, 48, pp. 289-308.
Pinguelli, R., S. Luiz, K. Ribeiro, M.S. Muylaert, and C. Pires de Campos, 2004: Comments on the Brazilian Proposal and contributions to global temperature increase with different climate responses - CO2 emissions due to fossil fuels, CO2 emissions due to land use change. Energy Policy, 32(13), pp. 1499-1510.
Pizer, W., 1999: Choosing price or quantity controls for greenhouse gases. Climate Issues Brief, Resources for the Future, 17.
Pizer, W.A., 2002: Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. Journal of Public Economics, 85(3), pp. 409-434.
Pizer, W.A. and K. Tamura, 2004: Climate Policy in the U.S. and Japan: A Workshop Summary, Resources for the Future Discussion Paper. 04-22, March, 2004.
Pizer, W.A., 2005a: Climate policy design under uncertainty. Discussion Paper 05-44, Resources for the Future.
Pizer, W.A., 2005b: The case for intensity targets. Climate Policy, 5(4), pp. 455-462.
Pizer, W., D. Burtraw, W. Harrington, R. Newell, and J. Sanchirico, 2006: Modeling Economy-wide vs. Sectoral Climate Policies. The Energy Journal, 27(3).
Popp, D., 2002: They don’t invent them like they used to: an examination of energy patent citation over time. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 11415, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Popp, D., 2004: R&D subsidies and climate policy: Is there a free lunch? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 10880, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Porter, M.E. and C. van der Linde, 1995: Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), pp. 97-118.
Price, L., 2005: Voluntary agreements for energy efficiency or GHG emission reduction in industry: An assessment of programs around the world. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-58138, April 2005.
Quirion, P., 2005: Does uncertainty justify intensity emission caps? Resource & Energy Economics, 27(4), November 2005, pp. 343-353.
Rabe, B.G., 2004: Statehouse and greenhouse, the emerging politics of American climate change policy. Washington, Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
Reedman, L., P. Graham, and P. Coombes, 2006: Using a real-options approach to model technology adoption under carbon price uncertainty: An application to the Australian electricity sector. The Economic Record, 82, Special Issue, pp. 864-873.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), 2005: Regional greenhouse gas initiative, Memorandum of Understanding. December, 2005, accessed at <http://www.rggi.org/agreement.htm>, accessed 03/07/07.
Reinhardt, F., 1998: Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40(1), pp. 43-73.
Reinhardt, F., 1999: Market failure and the environmental policies of firms, economic rationales for ‘beyond compliance’ behavior. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(1), pp. 9-21.
Reinhardt, F., 2000: What every executive needs to know about global warming. Harvard Business Review, July/August, 2000.
Reinhardt, F. and K.O. Packard, 2001: A business manager’s approach to climate change. Climate Change: Science, Strategies, and Solutions, E. Claussen (ed.), Leiden, Boston, Koln, Brill, 2001.
Reinstein, R., 2004: A possible way forward on climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, 2004, pp. 295-309.
Revesz, R.L. and R.N. Stavins, 2006: Environmental Law and Policy. Handbook of Law and Economics, A.M. Polinsky and S. Shavell (eds). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Richards, M., 2003: Poverty reduction, equity and climate change: Global governance synergies or contradictions? Overseas Development Institute, Globalisation and Poverty Programme.
Rietbergen, M. and K. Blok, 2000: Voluntary agreements- implementation and efficiency. <http://www.akf.dk/VAIE/>, accessed 03/07/07.
Rietbergen, M.G., J.C.M. Farla, and K. Blok, 2002: Do agreements enhance energy efficiency improvement? Analysing the actual outcome of long-term agreements on industrial energy efficiency improvement. The Netherlands Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, pp. 153-163.
Ringius, L., A. Torvanger, and B. Holtsmark, 1998: Can multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens? - OECD results from three burden sharing rules. Energy Policy, 26(10), pp. 777-793.
Ringius, L., A. Torvanger, and A. Underdal, 2002: Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2, pp. 1-22.
Rive, N., A. Torvanger and J.S. Fuglestvedt, 2006: Climate agreements based on responsibility for global warming: periodic updating, policy choices, and regional costs. Global Environmental Change.
Rivera, J., 2002: Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 35, pp. 333-360.
Rivera, J. and P. deLeon, 2004: Is greener whiter? The Sustainable Slopes Program and the voluntary environmental performance of western ski areas. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), pp. 417-437.
Rose, A., B. Stevens, J. Edmonds, and M. Wise, 1998: International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environmental & Resource Economics, 12(1), pp. 25-51.
Rosen, J., W. Fichtner, and O. Rentz, 2004: Baseline standardization with optimising energy system models. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, pp.121-146.
Russell, C. and W. Vaughan, 2003: The choice of pollution control policy instruments in developing countries: Arguments, evidence and suggestions. H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg (eds), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2003/2004, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.
Sagar, A., 2000: Capacity building for the environment: A view for the South, A view for the North. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, pp. 377-439.
Sagar, A.D. and B.C.C. van der Zwaan, 2006: Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D deployment, and learning-by-doing. Energy Policy, November 2006.
Saito, K., 2001: Observation on voluntary initiatives as environmental policy. Keizai Kenkyuu Nenpo (Yearbook of Economic Studies), Tokyo University, 26, pp. 91-108.
Sakakibara, M., 2001: Cooperative research and development: who participates and in which industries do projects take place? Research Policy, 30, pp. 993-1018.
Samaniego, J. and C. Figueres, 2002: Evolving to a sector-based Clean Development Mechanism. Options for protecting the climate. K.A. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, and J.F. Perkaus. Washington, WRI.
San Martin, R., 2003: Marketable emissions permits with imperfect monitoring. Energy Policy, 31, pp. 1369-1378.
Sathaye, J., S. Murtishaw, L. Price, M. Lefranc, J. Roy, H. Winkler, and R. Spalding-Fecher, 2004: Multiproject baselines for evaluation of electric power projects. Energy Policy, 32, pp. 1303-1317.
Sathaye, J., E. Holt, and S. De La Rue du Can, 2005: Overview of IPR practices for publicly-funded technologies. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report # 59072, Berkeley.
Sauer, A., P. Mettler, F. Wellington, and G.G. Hartmann, 2005: Transparency issues with ACEA agreement: Are investors driving blindly? World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
Schelling, T.C., 1997: The cost of combating global warming, facing the tradeoffs. Foreign Affairs, November/December.
Schelling, T.C., 2002: What makes greenhouse sense? Foreign Affairs, May/June COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)6 32.
Schipper, L., 2006: Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC Process. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 15(1), pp. 82 - April 2006.
Schleich, J. and R. Betz, 2005: Incentives for energy efficiency and innovation in the European Emission Trading System. Proceedings of the 2005 ECEEE Summer Study - What works and who delivers? Mandelieu, France, pp.1495.
Schmidt, J., N. Helme, J. Lee, M. Houdashelt, and N. Höhne, 2006: Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture. Climate Policy.
Sebenius, J.K., 1993: The Law of the Sea Conference: Lessons for negotiations to control global warming. G. Sjostedt (ed.), International Environment Negotiations, IIASA, pp. 189-216.
Shrestha, R. and G. Timilsina, 2002: The additionality criterion for identifying clean development mechanism projects under the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy, 30, pp.73-79.
Sijm, J., J.C. Jansen, and A. Torvanger, 2001: Differentiation of mitigation commitments: the multi-sector convergence approach. Climate Policy, 1(4), pp. 481-497.
Sijm, J., 2004: Induced technological change and spillovers in climate policy modeling. Energy Research Centre, The Netherlands, ECN-C-04-073.
Sijm, J., 2005: The interaction between the EU emissions trading scheme and national energy policies. Climate Policy, 5(1), pp. 79-96.
Sijm, J., K. Neuhoff, and Y. Chen, 2006: CO2 cost pass through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1), pp. 49-72.
Smith, J. and S.J. Scherr, 2002: Forest carbon and local livelihoods: assessment of opportunities and policy recommendations. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 37. CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research), Bogor, Indonesia.
Sohn, J., S. Nakhouda, and K. Baumert, 2005: Mainstreaming climate change at the multilateral development banks. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
Sorrell, S. and J. Sijm, 2003: Carbon trading in the policy mix. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3), pp. 420-437.
Spalding-Fecher, R., S. Thorne, and N. Wamukonya, 2002: Residential solar water heating as a potential Clean Development Mechanism project: A South African case study. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, pp. 135-153.
Springer, U. and M. Varilek, 2004: Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008-12. Energy Policy, 32, pp. 611-621.
Stavins, R.N., 2001: Economic analysis of global climate change policy: A primer. Climate Change: Science, Strategies, and Solutions. E. Claussen, V.A. Cochran, and D.P. Davis. Boston. Brill 18 Discussion paper 2003-2: draft ver. 1 August 2003 Publishing.
Stavins, 2003: Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. Handbook of Environmental Economics, I, K.-G. Mäler and J. Vincent (eds), Chapter 9, pp. 355-435. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Sterk, W. and B. Wittneben, 2005: Addressing opportunities and challenges of a sectoral approach to the clean development mechanism. JIKO Policy Paper 1/2005, August 2005, Wuppertal Institute, Wuppertal. Available at <http://www.wupperinst.org/jiko>, accessed 03/07/07.
Sterner, T., 2003: Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future Press.
Stewart, R.B. and J.B. Wiener, 2001: Reconstructing climate policy: The paths ahead. Policy Matters, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, DC August: 01-23.
Stewart, R. and J. Wiener, 2003: Practical climate change policy. Issues on Line in Science and Technology. National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.
Storey, M., 2002: Kyoto and beyond, issues and options in the global response to climate change. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. <http://www.internat.naturvardsverket.se/documents/issues/climate/report/Kyoto.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
Stranland, J., C. Chavez, and B. Field, 2002: Enforcing emissions trading programs: Theory, practice, and performance. Policy Studies Journal, 303(3), pp. 343-361.
Sugiyama, T., J. Sinton, O. Kimura, and T. Ueno, 2003: Orchestra of Treaties. CRIEPI, Tokyo, Japan.
Sugiyama, T. and J. Sinton, 2005: Orchestra of treaties: A future climate regime scenario with multiple treaties among like-minded countries. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5, pp. 65-88.
Sussman, F. and N. Helme, 2004: Harnessing financial flows from export credit agencies for climate protection. Washington D.C., USA, Center for Clean Air Policy.
Sussman, F., N. Helme, and C. Kelly, 2004: Establishing Greenhouse Gas Emission Caps for Multinational Corporations. Washington D.C., USA, Center for Clean Air Policy.
Swift, B., 2001: How environmental laws work: An analysis of the utility sector’s response to regulation of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide under the clean air act. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 14, 309 pp.
Tangen, K. and H. Hasselknippe, 2005: Converging markets. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 5, pp. 47-64.
Tanikawa, H., 2004: Incentive structure of the voluntary environmental responses of the japanese industrial enterprises. RIETI Discussion Paper 04-J-30, pp. 1-55, 2004, Summary, RIETI Journal, pp.1-4.
Thackeray, R.W., 2004: Struggling for air: The Kyoto Protocol, citizen’s suits under the Clean Air Act, and the United States Options for Addressing Global Climate Change. Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, 14, 855 pp.
Thalmann, P. and A. Baranzini 2005: An overview of the economics of voluntary approaches in climate policies. Edward Elgar, United Kingdom.
Tietenberg, T., 2000: Environmental and natural resource economics, 4th ed. New York: Harper-Collins.
Tietenberg, T., 2003: The tradable permits approach to protecting the commons: Lessons for Climate Change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3), pp. 400-419.
Tietenberg, T., 2006: Emissions trading: Principles and practice, Second Edition. Washington: RFF Press.
Tol, R.S.J., W. Lise, and B.C.C. Van der Zwaan, 2000: Technology diffusion and the stability of climate coalitions. February 2000.
Torvanger, A. and T. Skodvi, 2002: Environmental agreements in climate politics. Voluntary Environmental Agreements- Process, Practice and Future Use, P. Brink, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK.
Torvanger, A. and G. Odd, 2004: An evaluation of pre-kyoto differentiation proposals for national greenhouse gas abatement targets. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 4, pp. 65-91.
Torvanger, A., G. Bang, H.H. Kolshus, and J. Vevatne, 2005: Broadening the climate regime: Design and feasibility of multi-stage climate agreements. Oslo, Norway, Center for International Climate and Environmental Research.
Trudinger, C.M. and I.G. Enting, 2005: Comparison of formalisms for attributing responsibility for climate change: Non-linearities in the Brazilian Proposal. Climatic Change, 68(1-2), pp. 67-99.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2004: International experiences with economic incentives for protecting the environment. National Center for Environmental Economics, EPA-236-R-04-001.
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2006: Climate Change: EPA and DOE should do more to encourage progress under two voluntary programs. GAO 06 97, April 2006, Washington, D.C. <http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0697.pdf>, accessed 03/07/07.
U.S. National Science Foundation, 2003: National patterns of research development resources: 2003. <http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf05308/sectd.htm>, accessed 03/07/07.
UNFCCC, 1997: Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Additional proposal by Parties. Document FCCC/AGBM/1997/MISC.1/Add.3, <http://www.unfccc.int>, accessed 03/07/07.
UNFCCC, 1997b: Paper no.1: Brazil, proposed elements of a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 2001: Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventh session, Addendum, Part 2: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties. Vol II, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 2003a: Indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small-scale CDM project activity categories. Appendix B1 of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities, Annex 6, Report of the 7th meeting of the Executive Board, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 2003b: Clarifications on issues relating to baselines and monitoring methodologies. Annex 1, Report of the 8th meeting of the Executive Board, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 2003c: Procedures for submission and consideration of a proposed new methodology. Annex 2, Report of the 8th meeting of the Executive Board, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 2006a: Synthesis report on regional workshops on Article 6 of the Convention. FCCC/2006/SBI/17, Bonn.
Van der Gaast, W., 2002: The scope for joint implementation in the EU candidate countries. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 2, pp. 277-292.
Van Vliet, O., A. Faaj, and C. Dieperink, 2003: Forestry projects under the Clean Development Mechanism? Climatic Change, 61, pp. 123-156.
Van Vuuren, D.P., M.G.J. den Elzen, M.M. Berk, P. Lucas, B. Eickhout, H. Eerens, and R. Oostenrijk, 2003: Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, the Netherlands. RIVM-report 728001025, <www.mnp.nl/en>, accessed 02/07/07.
Verhagen, A., G.J. Nabuurs, and J. Veraart, 2004: The role of land use in sustainable development: Options and constraints under climate change. M.T.J. Kok and H.C. de Coninck (ed.) Beyond Climate: Options for Broadening Climate Policy, RIVM Report 500036 001, Bilthoven, pp. 53-75.
Verheyen, R., 2003: Climate Change Damage in International Law, Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Rechtswissenschaften, Dissertation.
Victor, D.G., 1998: The operation and effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol’s non-compliance procedure. The Implementation and effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. D.G. Victor, K. Raustiala, and E.B. Skolnikoff (eds), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, Ch.4, pp. 137-176.
Victor, D.G., 2001a: The collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the struggle to slow global warming. Princeton, University Press.
Victor, D., 2001b: International agreements and the struggle to tame carbon. Global Climate Change, pp. 204-229.
Viguier, L., 2004: A proposal to increase developing country participation in international climate policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, pp. 195-204.
Vogel, D., Toffel, M., and D. Post, 2005: Environmental federalism in the European Union and the United States. A handbook of globalization and environmental policy: National Government Interventions in a Global Arena. F. Wiken, K. Zoeteman, and J. Pieters (eds), E. Elgar, United Kingdom.
Vöhringer, F. 2004: Forest conservation and the Clean Development Mechanism: Lessons from the Costa Rican protected areas project. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, pp. 217-240.
Wang, J., J. Yang, C. Ge, D. Cao, and J. Schreifels, 2004: Controlling sulfur dioxide in China: Will emission trading work? Environment, June. Washington, D.C., RFF Press.
Watanabe, C., 1999: Systems options for sustainable development-effect and limit of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry’s efforts to substitute technology for energy. Research Policy, 28, pp. 719-749.
Wätzold, F., 2004: SO2 emissions in Germany, Regulations to fight Waldsterben. Choosing Environmental Policy, W. Harrington, R.D. Morgenstern, and T. Sterner, eds, Washington, D.C. Resources for the Future Press.
WBGU, 2003: Climate Protection Strategies for the 21st Century. Kyoto and Beyond. German Advisory Council on Global Change, Berlin.
Weisslitz, M., 2002: Rethinking the equitable principle of common but differentiates responsibility: differential versus absolute norms of compliance and contribution in the global climate change context. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 13, pp. 473.
Welch, E.W., A. Mazur, and S. Bretschneider, 2000: Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: Levels of adoption and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide. Journal of Public Policy Analysis and Management, 19(3), pp. 407-426.
Werksman, J., 2001: Greenhouse gas emissions trading and the WTO: 153. In Inter-linkages. The Kyoto Protocol and the International Trade and Investment Regime. W. Bradnee, Chambers (ed.), United Nations University Press.
Werksman, J., 2005: The negotiations of the Kyoto Compliance System: Towards hard enforcement. In Implementing Climate Regime: International Compliance, O.S. Stokke, J. Hovi, and G. Ulfstein, Earthscan, London, pp. 17-37.
Wettestad, J., 1996: Acid Lessons? Assessing and explaining LRTAP implementation and effectiveness IIASA. Working Paper, March 1996.
Wettestad, J., 2005: Enhancing climate compliance - What are the lessons to learn from environmental regimes and the EU? In Implementing Climate Regime: International Compliance, O.S. Stokke, J. Hovi and G. Ulfstein, Earthscan, London, pp. 209-231.
Wicke, L., 2005: Beyond Kyoto - A new global climate certificate system. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer Verlag.
Wiener, J.B., 1999: Global environmental regulation: Instrument choice in legal context. In The Yale Law Journal, 108(4), pp. 677-800.
Willems, S. and K. Baumert, 2003: Institutional capacity and climate change, OECD document COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2003)5, Paris.
Winkler, H., R. Spalding-Fecher, and L. Tyani, 2002a: Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes. Climate Policy, 2, pp. 303-318.
Winkler, H., R. Spalding-Fecher, S. Mwakasonda, and O. Davidson, 2002b: Sustainable development policies and measures: Starting from development to tackle climate change. Options for protecting the climate. K.A. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, and J.F. Perkaus. Washington DC, WRI: 61-87.
Working Group on Baseline for CDM/JI Project, 2001: Technical Procedures for CDM/JI Projects at the Planning Stage, Interim Report to Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan, Tokyo, Ministry of the Environment, pp. 70.
World Bank, 2003: Survey of contingent financing and risk mitigation instruments for clean infrastructure projects. Nov 3003, Washington, D.C. <http://carbonfinance.org/Router.cfm?Page=DocLib&ht=23&dl=1>, accessed 02/07/07.
World Bank, 2004a: Striking a better balance - the Final Report of the Extractive Industries Review. The World Bank Group on Extractive Industries Group, Washington D.C.
World Bank, 2006: An investment framework for clean energy and development: A progress report. World Bank Group Development Committee, September 5, 2006 (DC2006-0012).
World Bank and International Emission Trading Association, 2006: State and trends of the Carbon Market 2006. Washington, D.C.
World Resources Institute/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD), 2004: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol, a corporate accounting and reporting standard. Revised Edition, ISBN 1-56973-568-9.
Yamaguchi, M., 2003: Environmental effectiveness of voluntary agreement to cope with climate change: An evaluation methodology, Mita Journal of Economics, 96(2), pp. 19-47.
Yamaguchi, M., 2004: Implementing the Kyoto Protocol commitment and their impacts on trade: Focusing on Japanese automobile fuel efficiency standards. Keio Economic Studies, 41(1).
Yamaguchi, M. and T. Sekine, 2006: A proposal for the Post-Kyoto framework. Keio Economic Studies, 43, pp. 85-112.
Yamin, F. and J. Depledge, 2004: The International Climate Change Regime: A guide to rules, institutions and procedures. Cambridge University Press.
Yohe, G., N. Andronova and M. Schlesinger, 2004: To hedge or not against an uncertain climate future? Science, 306, pp. 416-417.
Zarsky, L. and K. Gallagher, 2003: Searching for the Holy Grail? Making FDI Work for Sustainable Development. Analytical Paper, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Switzerland.
Zetterberg, L., K. Nilsson, M. Ahman, A.S. Kumlin, and L. Birgirsdotter, 2004: Analysis of national allocation plans of the EU ETS. Research Report, IVL, B-1591.
Zhang, C., T. Heller, M. May, 2001: Impact on global warming of development and structural changes in the electricity sector of Guangdong Province, China. In Energy Policy, 29, pp. 179-203.