REPORTS - SPECIAL REPORTS

Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry


Other reports in this collection

6. Estimates of Average Annual Carbon Stock Changes/Accounted for ARD Activities and Some Additional Activities

6.1. Afforestation, Reforestation, and Deforestation

    55. Different definitions and accounting approaches under Article 3.3 of the Kyoto Protocol produce different estimates of changes in carbon stocks. There are seven Definitional Scenarios described in Chapter 3 of the underlying report. Table 3 illustrates, with data and methods available at the time of the Special Report, the estimated carbon stock changes accounted from ARD activities under the IPCC and FAO Definitional Scenarios, assuming recent area conversion rates remain constant and excluding carbon in soils and wood products. Three different carbon accounting approaches have been applied to the FAO Definitional Scenario to illustrate the effect of different accounting approaches. [3.5.3, 3.5.4, Table 3-4, Table 3-17]

    56. The IPCC Definitional Scenario yields estimates of average annual accounted carbon stock changes from afforestation and reforestation in Annex I Parties from 2008 to 2012 of 7 to 46 Mt C yr-1. This would be offset by annual changes in carbon stocks from deforestation of about -90 Mt C yr-1, producing a net stock change of -83 to -44 Mt C yr-1. If hypothetically, for example, afforestation and reforestation rates were to be increased in Annex I Parties by 20% 4 for the years 2000 to 2012, estimated annual changes in carbon stocks would increase (from 7 to 46 Mt Cyr-1) to 7 to 49 Mt C yr-1. If hypothetically, for example, deforestation rates were to be decreased by 20%, estimated annual losses of carbon stocks due to deforestation would reduce (from -90 Mt C yr-1) to -72 Mt C yr-1. [3.5.4]

    57. The three accounting approaches under the FAO Definitional Scenario yield different results. Estimated average annual carbon stock changes in Annex I Parties from afforestation and reforestation are -759 to -243 Mt C yr-1 under the FAO land-based I approach; -190 to 295 Mt C yr-1 under the FAO land-based II approach; and 87 to 573 Mt C yr-1 under the FAO activity-based approach. Estimated average annual carbon stock changes from deforestation are about -90 Mt C yr-1 in all three approaches, as in the IPCC Definitional Scenario. [3.5.4]

    58. For comparison, the IPCC Definitional Scenario yields estimates of average annual accounted carbon stock changes from afforestation and reforestation globally from 2008 to 2012 of 197 to 584 Mt C yr-1. This would be offset by annual changes in carbon stocks from deforestation of about -1788 Mt C yr-1, producing a net stock change of -1591 to -1204 Mt C yr-1. If, hypothetically, for example, afforestation and reforestation rates were to be increased globally by 20% for the years 2000 to 2012, estimated annual changes in carbon stocks would increase (from 197 to 584 Mt C yr-1) to 208 to 629 Mt C yr-1. [3.5.4]
Table 4: Relative potential in 2010 for net change in carbon stocks through some improved management and changed land-use activities.a

(1) Activity (2) Total
Areab
(Mha)
(3) Assumed
Percentage of Total
Area of Column 2
under Activity
in 2010 (%)
(4) Net Annual
Rate of Change
in Carbon Stocks
per Hectareb
(t C ha-1 yr-1)
(5) Estimated
Net Change
in Carbon
in 2010
(Mt C yr-1)

A. Annex I Countries
a) Improved Management within a Land Usec
Forest Management 1900 10 0.5 100
Cropland Management 600 40 0.3 75
Grazing Land Management 1300 10 0.5 70
Agroforestry 83 30 0.5 12
Rice Paddies 4 80 0.1 <1
Urban Land Management 50 5 0.3 1
b) Land-Use Change
Conversion of Cropland to Grassland 600 5 0.8 24
Agroforestry <1 0 0 0
Wetland Restoration 230 5 0.4 4
Restoring Severely Degraded Land 12 5 0.25 1

B. Global Estimates
a) Improved Management within a Land Use
Forest Management 4050 10 0.4 0.4
Cropland Management 1300 30 0.3 125
Grazing Land Management 3400 10 0.7 240
Agroforestry 400 20 0.3 26
Rice Paddies 150 50 0.1 7
Urban Land Management 100 5 0.3 2
b) Land-Use Change
Agroforestry 630 20 3.1 390
Conversion of Cropland to Grassland 1500 3 0.8 38
Wetland Restoration 230 5 0.4 4
Restoring Severely Degraded Land 280 5 0.3 3

a Totals were not included in the table for several reasons: i) The list of candidate activities is not exclusive or complete; ii) it is unlikely that all countries would apply all candidate activities; and iii) the analysis does not presume to reflect the final interpretations of Article 3.4. Some of these estimates reflect considerable uncertainty.
b A summary of reference sources is contained in Tables 4-1 and 4-4 of this Special Report. Calculated values were rounded to avoid the appearance of precision beyond the intent of the authors. The rates given are average rates that are assumed to remain constant to 2010.
c Assumed to be the best available suite of management practices for each land use and climatic zone.


    59. In the IPCC Definitional Scenario and FAO Definitional Scenario with land-based I accounting approach, the accounted carbon stock changes are broadly consistent with the 2008-2012 actual changes in carbon stocks from land under Article 3.3. The IPCC and FAO Definitional Scenarios bring different amounts of land under Article 3.3, hence the estimated carbon stock changes in Table 3 differ.

    60. In the FAO Definitional Scenario with land-based II and activity-based accounting approaches, the accounted carbon stock change is not consistent with the 2008-2012 actual changes in carbon stocks on land under Article 3.3, except in the case of short rotation cycles.

    61. In neither of the two Definitional Scenarios is the accounted carbon stock change consistent with the 2008-2012 actual carbon stock changes, nor with the net exchanges with the atmosphere, at the national and global levels in part because the land under Article 3.3 is small in comparison with the national and global forest area. [3.3.2, 3.5.4]

Other reports in this collection

IPCC Homepage