|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTS - SPECIAL REPORTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry |
|
|
6. Estimates of Average Annual Carbon Stock Changes/Accounted for ARD Activities
and Some Additional Activities
6.1. Afforestation, Reforestation, and Deforestation
55. Different definitions and accounting approaches under Article 3.3 of the
Kyoto Protocol produce different estimates of changes in carbon stocks. There
are seven Definitional Scenarios described in Chapter 3 of the underlying
report. Table 3 illustrates, with data and methods available at the time of
the Special Report, the estimated carbon stock changes accounted from ARD
activities under the IPCC and FAO Definitional Scenarios, assuming recent
area conversion rates remain constant and excluding carbon in soils and wood
products. Three different carbon accounting approaches have been applied to
the FAO Definitional Scenario to illustrate the effect of different accounting
approaches. [3.5.3, 3.5.4, Table
3-4, Table 3-17]
56. The IPCC Definitional Scenario yields estimates of average annual accounted
carbon stock changes from afforestation and reforestation in Annex I Parties
from 2008 to 2012 of 7 to 46 Mt C yr-1. This would be offset by annual changes
in carbon stocks from deforestation of about -90 Mt C yr-1, producing a net
stock change of -83 to -44 Mt C yr-1. If hypothetically, for example, afforestation
and reforestation rates were to be increased in Annex I Parties by 20%
4
for the years 2000 to 2012, estimated annual changes in carbon stocks would
increase (from 7 to 46 Mt Cyr-1) to 7 to 49 Mt C yr-1. If hypothetically,
for example, deforestation rates were to be decreased by 20%, estimated annual
losses of carbon stocks due to deforestation would reduce (from -90 Mt C yr-1)
to -72 Mt C yr-1. [3.5.4]
57. The three accounting approaches under the FAO Definitional Scenario yield
different results. Estimated average annual carbon stock changes in Annex
I Parties from afforestation and reforestation are -759 to -243 Mt C yr-1
under the FAO land-based I approach; -190 to 295 Mt C yr-1 under the FAO land-based
II approach; and 87 to 573 Mt C yr-1 under the FAO activity-based approach.
Estimated average annual carbon stock changes from deforestation are about
-90 Mt C yr-1 in all three approaches, as in the IPCC Definitional Scenario.
[3.5.4]
58. For comparison, the IPCC Definitional Scenario yields estimates of average
annual accounted carbon stock changes from afforestation and reforestation
globally from 2008 to 2012 of 197 to 584 Mt C yr-1. This would be offset by
annual changes in carbon stocks from deforestation of about -1788 Mt C yr-1,
producing a net stock change of -1591 to -1204 Mt C yr-1. If, hypothetically,
for example, afforestation and reforestation rates were to be increased globally
by 20% for the years 2000 to 2012, estimated annual changes in carbon stocks
would increase (from 197 to 584 Mt C yr-1) to 208 to 629 Mt C yr-1. [3.5.4]
Table 4: Relative potential in 2010 for
net change in carbon stocks through some improved management and changed land-use
activities.a
|
|
(1) Activity |
(2) Total
Areab
(Mha)
|
(3) Assumed
Percentage of Total
Area of Column 2
under Activity
in 2010 (%)
|
(4) Net Annual
Rate of Change
in Carbon Stocks
per Hectareb
(t C ha-1 yr-1)
|
(5) Estimated
Net Change
in Carbon
in 2010
(Mt C yr-1)
|
|
A. Annex I Countries |
|
|
|
|
a) Improved Management within a Land Usec |
|
|
|
|
Forest Management |
1900
|
10
|
0.5
|
100
|
Cropland Management |
600
|
40
|
0.3
|
75
|
Grazing Land Management |
1300
|
10
|
0.5
|
70
|
Agroforestry |
83
|
30
|
0.5
|
12
|
Rice Paddies |
4
|
80
|
0.1
|
<1
|
Urban Land Management |
50
|
5
|
0.3
|
1
|
b) Land-Use Change |
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Cropland to Grassland |
600
|
5
|
0.8
|
24
|
Agroforestry |
<1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Wetland Restoration |
230
|
5
|
0.4
|
4
|
Restoring Severely Degraded Land |
12
|
5
|
0.25
|
1
|
|
B. Global Estimates |
|
|
|
|
a) Improved Management within a Land Use |
|
|
|
|
Forest Management |
4050
|
10
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
Cropland Management |
1300
|
30
|
0.3
|
125
|
Grazing Land Management |
3400
|
10
|
0.7
|
240
|
Agroforestry |
400
|
20
|
0.3
|
26
|
Rice Paddies |
150
|
50
|
0.1
|
7
|
Urban Land Management |
100
|
5
|
0.3
|
2
|
b) Land-Use Change |
|
|
|
|
Agroforestry |
630
|
20
|
3.1
|
390
|
Conversion of Cropland to Grassland |
1500
|
3
|
0.8
|
38
|
Wetland Restoration |
230
|
5
|
0.4
|
4
|
Restoring Severely Degraded Land |
280
|
5
|
0.3
|
3
|
|
a Totals were not included in the table for several reasons: i) The list
of candidate activities is not exclusive or complete; ii) it is unlikely that
all countries would apply all candidate activities; and iii) the analysis does
not presume to reflect the final interpretations of Article 3.4. Some of these
estimates reflect considerable uncertainty.
b A summary of reference sources is contained in Tables
4-1 and 4-4 of this Special Report. Calculated
values were rounded to avoid the appearance of precision beyond the intent of
the authors. The rates given are average rates that are assumed to remain constant
to 2010.
c Assumed to be the best available suite of management practices for each
land use and climatic zone.
|
|
59. In the IPCC Definitional Scenario and FAO Definitional Scenario with land-based
I accounting approach, the accounted carbon stock changes are broadly consistent
with the 2008-2012 actual changes in carbon stocks from land under Article
3.3. The IPCC and FAO Definitional Scenarios bring different amounts of land
under Article 3.3, hence the estimated carbon stock changes in Table
3 differ.
60. In the FAO Definitional Scenario with land-based II and activity-based accounting
approaches, the accounted carbon stock change is not consistent with the 2008-2012
actual changes in carbon stocks on land under Article 3.3, except in the case
of short rotation cycles.
61. In neither of the two Definitional Scenarios is the accounted carbon stock
change consistent with the 2008-2012 actual carbon stock changes, nor with
the net exchanges with the atmosphere, at the national and global levels in
part because the land under Article 3.3 is small in comparison with the national
and global forest area. [3.3.2, 3.5.4]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|