2.9.3 Global Mean Radiative Forcing by Emission Precursor
The RF due to changes in the concentration of a single forcing agent can have contributions from emissions of several compounds (Shindell et al., 2005). The RF of CH4, for example, is affected by CH4 emissions, as well as NOx emissions. The CH4 RF quoted in Table 2.12 and shown in Figure 2.20 is a value that combines the effects of both emissions. As an anthropogenic or natural emission can affect several forcing agents, it is useful to assess the current RF caused by each primary emission. For example, emission of NOx affects CH4, tropospheric ozone and tropospheric aerosols. Based on a development carried forward from the TAR, this section assesses the RF terms associated with each principal emission including indirect RFs related to perturbations of other forcing agents, with the results shown in Figure 2.21. The following indirect forcing mechanisms are considered:
- fossil carbon from non-CO2 gaseous compounds, which eventually increase CO2 in the atmosphere (from CO, CH4, and NMVOC emissions);
- changes in stratospheric ozone (from N2O and halocarbon (CFCs, HCFC, halons, etc.) emissions);
- changes in tropospheric ozone (from CH4, NOx, CO, and NMVOC emissions);
- changes in OH affecting the lifetime of CH4 (from CH4, CO, NOx, and NMVOC emissions); and
- changing nitrate and sulphate aerosols through changes in NOx and SO2 emissions, respectively.
For some of the principal RFs (e.g., BC, land use and mineral dust) there is not enough quantitative information available to assess their indirect effects, thus their RFs are the same as those presented in Table 2.12. Table 2.5 gives the total (fossil and biomass burning) direct RFs for BC and organic carbon aerosols that are used to obtain the average shown in Figure 2.21. Table 2.13 summarises the direct and indirect RFs presented in Figure 2.21, including the methods used for estimating the RFs and the associated uncertainty. Note that for indirect effects through changes in chemically active gases (e.g., OH or ozone), the emission-based RF is not uniquely defined since the effect of one precursor will be affected by the levels of the other precursors. The RFs of indirect effects on CH4 and ozone by NOx, CO and VOC emissions are estimated by removing the anthropogenic emissions of one precursor at a time. A sensitivity analysis by Shindell et al. (2005) indicates that the nonlinear effect induced by treating the precursors separately is of the order of 10% or less. Very uncertain indirect effects are not included in Table 2.13 and Figure 2.21. These include ozone changes due to solar effects, changes in secondary organic aerosols through changes in the ozone/OH ratio and apportioning of the cloud albedo changes to each aerosol type (Hansen et al., 2005).
Table 2.12. Global mean radiative forcings since 1750 and comparison with earlier assessments. Bold rows appear on Figure 2.20. The first row shows the combined anthropogenic RF from the probability density function in panel B of Figure 2.20. The sum of the individual RFs and their estimated errors are not quite the same as the numbers presented in this row due to the statistical construction of the probability density function.
| Global mean radiative forcing (W m–2)a | |
---|
| SAR (1750–1993) | TAR (1750–2005) | AR4 (1750-2005) | Summary comments on changes since the TAR |
---|
Combined Anthropogenic RF | Not evaluated | Not evaluated | 1.6 [–1.0, +0.8] | Newly evaluated. Probabilitydensity function estimate |
---|
Long-lived Greenhouse gases (Comprising CO2, CH4, N2O, and halocarbons) | +2.45 [15%] (CO2 1.56; CH4 0.47; N2O 0.14; Halocarbons 0.28) | +2.43 [10%] (CO2 1.46; CH4 0.48; N2O 0.15; Halocarbons 0.34b) | +2.63 [±0.26] (CO2 1.66 [±0.17]; CH4 0.48 [±0.05]; N2O 0.16 [±0.02]; Halocarbons 0.34[±0.03]) | Total increase in RF, due toupward trends, particularly inCO2. Halocarbon RF trendis positiveb |
Stratospheric ozone | –0.1 [2x] | –0.15 [67%] | –0.05 [±0.10] | Re-evaluated to be weaker |
Tropospheric ozone | +0.40 [50%] | +0.35 [43%] | +0.35 [–0.1, +0.3] | Best estimate unchanged.However, a larger RF couldbe possible |
Stratospheric water vapourfrom CH4 | Not evaluated | +0.01 to +0.03 | +0.07 [±0.05] | Re-evaluated to be higher |
Total direct aerosol | Not evaluated | Not evaluated | –0.50 [±0.40] | Newly evaluated |
Direct sulphate aerosol | –0.40 [2x] | –0.40 [2x] | –0.40 [±0.20] | Better constrained |
Direct fossil fuel aerosol (organic carbon) | Not evaluated | –0.10 [3x] | –0.05 [±0.05] | Re-evaluated to be weaker |
Direct fossil fuel aerosol (BC) | +0.10 [3x] | +0.20 [2x] | +0.20 [±0.15] | Similar best estimate to the TAR.Response affected by semi-direct effects |
Direct biomass burning aerosol | –0.20 [3x] | –0.20 [3x] | +0.03 [±0.12] | Re-evaluated and sign changed.Response affected by semi-direct effects |
Direct nitrate aerosol | Not evaluated | Not evaluated | –0.10 [±0.10] | Newly evaluated |
Direct mineral dust aerosol | Not evaluated | –0.60 to +0.40 | –0.10 [±0.20] | Re-evaluated to have a smalleranthropogenic fraction |
Cloud albedo effect | 0 to –1.5 (sulphate only) | 0.0 to –2.0 (all aerosols) | –0.70 [–1.1, +0.4] (all aerosols) | Best estimate now given |
Surface albedo (land use) | Not evaluated | –0.20 [100%] | –0.20 [±0.20] | Additional studies |
Surface albedo (BC aerosol on snow) | Not evaluated | Not evaluated | +0.10 [±0.10] | Newly evaluated |
Persistent linear contrails | Not evaluated | 0.02 [3.5x] | 0.01 [–0.007, +0.02] | Re-evaluated to be smaller |
Solar irradiance | +0.30 [67%] | +0.30 [67%] | +0.12 [–0.06, +0.18] | Re-evaluated to be less than half |
Table. 2.13. Emission-based RFs for emitted components with radiative effects other than through changes in their atmospheric abundance. Minor effects where the estimated RF is less than 0.01 W m–2 are not included. Effects on sulphate aerosols are not included since SO2 emission is the only significant factor affecting sulphate aerosols. Method of calculation and uncertainty ranges are given in the footnotes. Values represent RF in 2005 due to emissions and changes since 1750. See Figure 2.21 for graphical presentation of these values.
| CO2 | CH4 | CFC/ HCFC | N2O | HFC/ PFC/SF6 | BC- direct | BC snow albedo | Organic carbon | O3(T)a | O3(S)b | H2O(S)c | Nitrate aerosols | Indirect cloud albedo effect |
---|
Component emitted | Atmospheric or surface change directly causing radiative forcing |
CO2 | 1.56d | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CH4 | 0.016d | 0.57e | | | | | | | 0.2e | | 0.07f | | |
CFC/HCFC/halons | | | 0.32g | | | | | | | –0.04h | | | |
N2O | | | | 0.15g | | | | | | –0.01h | | | |
HFC/PFC/SF6 | | | | | 0.017g | | | | | | | | |
CO/VOC | 0.06d | 0.08e | | | | | | | 0.13e | | | | |
NOx | | –0.17e | | | | | | | 0.06e | | | –0.10i | Xj |
BC | | | | | | 0.34k | 0.1l | | | | | | Xj |
OC | | | | | | | | –0.19k | | | | | Xj |
SO2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Xj |